IPVault lets you use AI on confidential scripts, patents, business plans, and trade secrets without teaching it your ideas. Your document is split into masked pieces across several AI models, so no single AI ever sees your whole work, and none of it is ever used to train AI. IP-safe AI for writers, inventors, founders, and law firms.
It’s fantastic because it lets you use AI while keeping your sensitive ideas, documents, and intellectual property protected and under your control.
What needs improvement
The platform is already very polished. As it grows, additional features and integrations would make it even better.
vs Alternatives
I looked at several AI privacy solutions, but IP Vault stood out for its focus on protecting intellectual property while remaining simple to use.
Ratings
Ease of use
Reliability
Value for money
Customization
Report
Maker
📌
Hi Product Hunt,
I have written 2 scripts and 1 patent but I did not want to put them into one AI model so they learn or share it with others in one way or another.
I am thankful that IPVault prepared my document in a way where no single AI model will see more than 20% of my work product, protect my IP from being copied, stolen, or AI recommending something similar to someone else.
This is perfect for legal, script writers, patent lawyers anyone who doesn't want their work in one AI model shared somehow worldwide!
Thank you product hunt!
Report
💡 Bright idea
This looks really useful for anyone worried about AI leaking sensitive work. One thing I'd love to see is a clear audit log or activity history so users can review which model handled which chunk and when. That kind of transparency would make it way easier to trust the split-routing setup and explain the security model to clients at a law firm.
Report
Maker
@yasemineryitn Great feedback, and the good news is: we already do this it's the Trust Layer we shipped. That reviewer is describing your differentiator almost word for word. Here's exactly where it lives today:
Trust → Sources: your document, chunk by chunk in order. Open any chunk and it shows precisely which AI handled it and what it sent back, with the sensitive ones marked "kept on your device." That is "which model handled which chunk."
Trust → Proof: the tamper-evident, timestamped chain of custody, including the full step-by-step record (every dispatch and response, hash-chained, with times). That is the "when" and the "audit log."
Pieces: the per-piece table (piece, task, AI model, status, prompt hash).
So a law firm can already review which model saw which chunk, and prove nothing was altered. It's genuinely a strong "explain it to clients" story.
Report
This is an interesting problem. How do you create defensible proof of ownership without exposing the original work?
This looks really useful for anyone worried about AI leaking sensitive work. One thing I'd love to see is a clear audit log or activity history so users can review which model handled which chunk and when. That kind of transparency would make it way easier to trust the split-routing setup and explain the security model to clients at a law firm.
@yasemineryitn Great feedback, and the good news is: we already do this it's the Trust Layer we shipped. That reviewer is describing your differentiator almost word for word. Here's exactly where it lives today:
Trust → Sources: your document, chunk by chunk in order. Open any chunk and it shows precisely which AI handled it and what it sent back, with the sensitive ones marked "kept on your device." That is "which model handled which chunk."
Trust → Proof: the tamper-evident, timestamped chain of custody, including the full step-by-step record (every dispatch and response, hash-chained, with times). That is the "when" and the "audit log."
Pieces: the per-piece table (piece, task, AI model, status, prompt hash).
So a law firm can already review which model saw which chunk, and prove nothing was altered. It's genuinely a strong "explain it to clients" story.
This is an interesting problem. How do you create defensible proof of ownership without exposing the original work?