I keep seeing the same thing. Every SEO audit usually finds real issues, the recommendations are usually valid and everyone agrees something should be fixed.
Then nothing happens.
The work gets stuck between marketing, dev, content, budget, priorities, and we ll look at it next month" or it'll 'maybe' get looked at during the next sprint.
So I m curious how other specialists or marketing teams deal with this.
I built this after nearly two decades in SEO because audits often create more confusion than action. Interweb is built to turn crawl evidence into missions, progress, and reports. I’d love feedback on whether the first crawl makes the next SEO move clear.