I built Inspector because Solana token research often feels fragmented across several tools and raw data sources. One tool shows holder concentration. Another shows liquidity. Another shows wallet activity. Others give a risk score without making the reasoning very easy to inspect. I wanted one workflow that brings those signals together while keeping the evidence visible. Inspector analyzes holder distribution, liquidity structure, token authorities, creator relationships, early-wallet behavior, recent participants, bundler and sniper evidence, wallet activity, and modeled exitability. One design principle mattered to me from the beginning: Inspector should not manufacture certainty. It does not automatically label a token “safe” or declare something a scam. Risk signals are evidence to interpret, not proof of intent. The product is live now, and I’m especially interested in feedback from people who already analyze Solana tokens manually or use other scanners. If something is wrong, weak, unclear, or missing, I’d rather hear that than generic praise.

Inspector

Solana token risk analysis with evidence, not just scores

Solana token risk analysis with evidence, not just scores