Imagizer Engine

Real time image transformation service

2 followers

Real time image transformation service

2 followers

Visit website

Launch tags:Productivity•API•Photography

Launch Team

World model AI : Sharm SEKAISimulate your idea on a living world.

Promoted

So I signed up and pricing is: Plan Details $1.00 per 1000 requests Doesn't seem like they have a free plan. How it works: You give them a url or s3 bucket where your images are hosted and they pair that with a subdomain of your choosing. When you request the image, you attach various query params to the url to edit the image. (ex. h**p://HOSTNAME/image.jpg?width=200). Full list of operations can be found here http://demo.imagizercdn.com/doc/...

Report

10yr ago

Imagizer Engine

Maker

@justingosan There is a $15.00 credit added to each new account, which makes it free for 15,000 transformations or any API requests.

Report

10yr ago

Imagizer Engine

Maker

We are pleased to have added image recognition to ImagizerEngine. Check it out! http://demo.nventify.com/doc/#im...

Report

10yr ago

Imagizer Engine

Maker

@npettas83 thanks Nick!

Report

10yr ago

Shelfie

I've used an early version of this with my mobile app Shelfie and it gave us a huge improvement in image loading speed.

Report

10yr ago

Imagizer Engine

Maker

@hudpeter Thanks Peter!

Report

10yr ago

Imagizer Engine

Maker

Imagizer has SDKs in following languages: Java, JS, PHP, Python, Swift. Check out github: https://github.com/Nventify for examples of implementation on mobile Apps.

Report

10yr ago

Very interesting. How would you compare to imgix?

Report

10yr ago

Imagizer Engine

Maker

@menimor I think in some ways Imgix might be better, and in same cases Imagizer will be, for example, I just ran a resizing test on the same image (from imgix asset library), and Imagizer appears to be 3x faster for uncached resizing transformations, here is the test data: https://gist.github.com/anonymou... Pricing wise, Imgix charges for bandwidth and accessed master files, which means even if you have very low bandwidth usage you will still be charged master files (if they are accessed even once). Imagizer follows pay as you go model, e.g. you are only charged for API access, $1 for 1,000 - this makes it very simple to budget the costs. Depending on how large or small your resulting files are, Imgix or Imagizer would win on price. E.g. Imagizer wins on higher resolution files, but Imgix may win on smaller resolution files since they account for bandwidth in GB transferred. I think Imagizer has a more flexible model, and just simpler to understand. Imagizer has image recognition capabilities, for example, we can recognize dog breeds: imgdog.nventify.com/a/img921/6544/i399Su.jpg?labels=true {"Name":"Dog","Confidence":92}, {"Name":"German Shepherd","Confidence":92} Imagizer knows with 92% confidence that its sees a German Shepherd >:)

Report

10yr ago

@jack_levin this is an amazing answer. Thank you for taking the time to write this. We currently use imagix, but on a very small scale. We have a ticket in the backlog to look into alternatives, will def add imagizer to the list.

Report

10yr ago

Imagizer Engine

Maker

@menimor Awesome! We will be happy to support you guys. This video might be helpful on how Vango Art uses Imagizer in their AWS stack:

Report

10yr ago

@jack_levin professional stuff :)

Report

10yr ago

How does it compare to Cloudinary? Is it your direct competitor?

Report

10yr ago

Imagizer Engine

Maker

@bausofthenauf Cloudinary focuses on being an complete image hosting and delivery solution. Imagizer aims to become part of your existing stack as a building block.

Report

10yr ago

Congrats with PH launch! Imagizer is cool, love simplicity and API.

Report

10yr ago

Imagizer Engine

Maker

@genbit thanks Sergey!

Report

10yr ago

1 2

Reviews