Choose a task you do every week, then pick an AI model. Watch how fast it finishes, and see what happened in those seconds: what it read, understood, thought through, wrote — and how accurate it was.
Hey PH 👋
I got tired of AI speed claims I couldn't verify, so I built a site that measures 12 models (Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta, DeepSeek, Google, Z-AI, NVIDIA) against 25 everyday tasks — write an email, summarize a paper, explain a block of code — and shows the real recorded time, tokens, cost, and accuracy for every pairing.
Nothing is measured live when you visit. A scheduled job runs each task against each model on a fixed cadence and records the response as it streams in — visitors replay that recording at the pace it originally arrived. I did the cost math on live-per-visitor calls first: at any real traffic it's hundreds to thousands a month and scales with visitors, not with value delivered. Recorded costs the same at ten visitors or ten thousand.
A few things that surprised me building it:
An output token cap was silently truncating long-form tasks — understated generation time on 27% of my first real recording batch, no error, just quietly wrong numbers.
Free open-weight models (Gemma, GLM, Nemotron) sit on the same 25 tasks as $100/M-token flagships. Free is genuinely slower on some tasks — now that's a number instead of a guess.
"Which model should I use" needed cost, speed, and accuracy blended, not just whoever's fastest. The top pick for one category was cheapest and second-fastest, not fastest outright.
Every number is a recorded run, a scored rating, or a labelled placeholder — methodology page states which, per number. Would love feedback, especially if something looks off.
howfastai.com