I built GeoCheckTool because a single screenshot or universal visibility score hides the questions that matter: which surface was observed, what question was asked, whether the brand was mentioned, which pages were cited, and whether a missing answer was actually a provider or surface failure. GeoCheckTool starts with confirmed business facts and buyer questions. The free Quick Diagnosis repeats a small frozen sample and preserves the observed answers and sources. Formal Diagnosis expands the frozen scope; later retests are compared with the baseline rather than presented as guaranteed improvement. The product deliberately separates model/API observations, search-result surfaces, and consumer applications. It also separates publication, crawling, indexing, ranking, mention, citation, recommendation, and conversion. None of those outcomes is guaranteed. I would value direct feedback on the evidence model, the report, and the places where the product should make uncertainty clearer. Public methodology: https://geochecktool.com/methodo...

GeoCheckTool

Diagnose how AI search sees and cites your brand

Diagnose how AI search sees and cites your brand