Launched this week
Fixure | Security Decision Intelligence
Turn security chaos into system clarity
210 followers
Turn security chaos into system clarity
210 followers
Security teams don’t lack data. They lack clarity. Fixure is a Security Decision Intelligence layer that sits above existing security tools. It reconciles duplicated and conflicting signals into a single model of reality, explains downstream impact, and helps teams understand what matters before taking action. Fixure doesn’t generate findings. It makes sense of what you already have.
Excited for this! Looks useful!
@carlos__ Thank you!
@carlos__ Thank you for the support
Hey Product Hunt community 👋
We’re excited to share something we’ve been building for a while.
A product that answers the persistent question,”What should we fix first and why?”
There are tons of cybersecurity tools out there, but when it came time to make real decisions, something always felt off. We had plenty of signals but not enough clarity around what actually mattered versus what was just noise.
So as security engineers we built what we wished existed: a Security Decision Intelligence layer that sits above existing tools and helps teams reason about risk, not just detect it.
What Fixure does:
Reconciles duplicated and conflicting signals into a single system reality
Explains downstream impact before action is taken
Helps teams decide which actions matter most and why
Compresses thousands of symptoms into fixable root causes
Fixure doesn’t replace scanners, it works with what you already have so teams can stop guessing at scale.
We’re opening up a beta and would genuinely love honest feedback from the community. If this resonates with your experience, we’d love to hear your thoughts and if there are other unique security products we should be learning from, please share.
Thanks for checking out Fixure!
Sameer
@fixure I'm excited to try this. With so many options out there, it would be nice to have a single product to use and fall back on. Do you have a tutorial for the use of your product?
@fixure @david_shaffer1 Thanks so much really appreciate the interest! We’re working on tutorials and walkthrough content, but in the meantime you can head to our website and click Get Beta Access or Schedule a Demo. We’d be happy to personally walk you through Fixure and answer any questions. Just let us know, excited to have you try it!
@david_shaffer1 Please create your Beta account and see how easy it is to use. It is our similation and has test data in the environment.
@fixure I liked the concept and the product seems modern and clean. Hope the integrations aren't too complex.
@fixure Root cause compression is the part that matters most here. Every scanner can flag a CVE, but when three tools report the same misconfiguration as separate findings, the remediation queue balloons and engineers start ignoring it. If Fixure preserves enough context in the compressed view so the person doing the fix understands the blast radius without reopening each original alert, that alone changes the workflow.
Interesting cybersecurity platform augmenting current tools the team is already using.
It seems like it simplifies communication, threat detection, impact analysis, facilitates decision making and reduces double efforts.
Does it also prevent hacks by assessing weaknesses before attacks happen?
@daniel_alonso2 Fixure doesn’t replace security tools or “block hacks” directly it makes them smarter. It connects all your existing security signals, removes noise, adds business context, maps potential impact, and tells you what to fix first so the issues most likely to cause a breach get addressed before attackers exploit them.
So when the Fixure tool helps you with cybersecurity risks, does it take information from web data. From websites such as those that are regularly updated to show more recent cybersecurity threats and attacks, along with how they are done (such as birthday attacks)?
@eduardo_chapa1 Fixure mainly works with the security data your organization already generates and turns it into prioritized, actionable decisions. We can integrate external threat intelligence feeds for additional context, but we’re not pulling general web data. The focus is clarity, prioritization, and remediation, not just more alerts. If you want to learn more go one Fixure.io and click on get beta access or schedule a demo.
@eduardo_chapa1 We appreciate your feedback! We are the tool that unifies ALL the tools.
I'm really intrigued by this, its always difficult to decide which problem is the most urget one. As someone who isnt tech savvy this will be very useful.
@jazmin_marez Really appreciate that. That’s exactly why we built Fixure. Instead of overwhelming teams with alerts, it helps prioritize what actually matters so decisions become clearer even for non-technical stakeholders. If you’re curious, feel free to check out our website and schedule a demo happy to walk you through it anytime.
Looking forward to trying this! Good luck Fixure!
How does the AI PM handle it when the codebase outgrows what PROPECT.md and REQUIREMENTS.md can capture? Static markdown context works early on, but once you hit 50+ files and cross-cutting features, the drift creeps back in because the docs lag behind the code. The phased Discuss to Verify loop is smart for keeping scope tight... would be interesting to see if PropelKit auto-updates those context files after each execution phase so the next Claude agent spawn starts with reality, not a stale snapshot.
@piroune_balachandran Great question this is the entropy problem, and it's core to why we built Fixure. Static context works when scale is small, but once complexity grows, reality changes faster than documentation. You see it in code docs, and we see the exact same pattern in security: vulnerability reports, risk dashboards, and scanner outputs drift away from what actually matters almost immediately.
Fixure's approach is the same shift you're describing moving from static snapshots to continuously generated context. We ingest signals across your existing security stack, correlate findings, map blast radius and dependencies, and keep risk prioritization aligned with what's actually happening in the environment. So instead of teams triaging from stale reports, they're working from a living view of what truly needs fixing.
The Discuss to Verify philosophy resonates with us too. Our algorithms continuously re-evaluate as new signals come in so prioritization doesn't drift and compound over time the way static vulnerability lists do.
If you'd like to see it in action, you can request beta access or schedule a demo from our site happy to walk you through how the context stays current under the hood.