Most figure tools give you one blank canvas. Figwise is six focused ones. AI drafts graphical abstracts and conceptual frameworks straight from your abstract, every text label still editable. The standards-bound diagrams are generated, not drawn: PRISMA 2020 and CONSORT 2010 in official wording, volcano plots and phylogenetic trees from your own numbers — those four run entirely in your browser, free, no signup. Export vector SVG or 300 dpi PNG at Elsevier/MDPI dimensions.
Hi Product Hunt 👋
I built Figwise after watching researchers around me lose half a day to Illustrator or
PowerPoint for a single figure — and then get a reviewer comment about a box that was
one word off the reporting standard.
So Figwise isn't one more blank canvas. It's six tools, split by what the figure actually
is:
• Things a model should draft — graphical abstracts and conceptual frameworks. Paste your
abstract, get four drafts, then edit every label. Nothing is flattened until export.
• Things a model should never guess — PRISMA 2020 and CONSORT 2010 flow diagrams, volcano
plots, phylogenetic trees. You type the numbers; deterministic code lays out the exact
official wording. No hallucinated box, no invented n.
Those last four run entirely in your browser: free, no account, and your data never
leaves the tab. Everything exports as vector SVG or 300 dpi PNG at Elsevier/MDPI
dimensions.
What I'd love feedback on: which figure type should come next? Kaplan–Meier curves,
forest plots and STROBE diagrams are all on the list and I genuinely don't know which
one hurts most.