FigureDraft: Research description in. Scientific figure draft out.

Hi hunters 👋 I’m Ludy, the indie developer behind FigureDraft. I built it around a frustration with diagram workflows: the blank canvas asks you to think about layout before you’ve settled what the figure should actually contain. FigureDraft starts with your research description instead. You review the objects, labels, and relationships, then generate and download a PNG draft. I’d love feedback on that review step specifically. Does it help you catch a missing element or an unclear relationship? Is anything difficult to judge before you see the image? I’m deliberately calling the output a draft. Scientific accuracy still needs your review, and I want that expectation to be clear from the start. Give it a try at https://figuredraft.com/ and tell me what you’d change.