Fedica

Publish and grow your profile across social apps

4.9•32 reviews•

1.2K followers

Publish and grow your profile across social apps

4.9•32 reviews•

1.2K followers

Visit website

Social media management tools

•

Social media scheduling tools

•

Keyword research tools

•

Social Networking

Your hub for social analytics, scheduling, and audience insights. Fedica is the people-level social suite for creators whose audience lives across networks. Know who engages, what they care about, and where they're from instead of tracking follower counts alone. Schedule and crosspost on 12+ networks, tailor each post per platform, and reply from one inbox. Deep analytics on followers, competitors, and topics across X, Bluesky, Mastodon, LinkedIn, and more.

This is the 4th launch from Fedica. View more

Fedica 2.0

Launching today

Publish and grow your profile across social apps

For creators who want to succeed when their fans are fragmented across platforms. Know who engages, what they care about, and where they're from, with deep audience segmentation and demographics. Publish tailored posts on 12+ platforms. Connect with engagers from one inbox. 15 years of audience intelligence, built on Tweepsmap's geographic foundation. We put the people back in your analytics.

Free Options

Launch tags:Social Media•Analytics•Marketing

Launch Team

Framer AI AgentsDesign and publish professional sites with AI

Promoted

The cross-platform audience stitching is exactly what community managers need — knowing the same person follows you on X and Farcaster and can be reached more effectively on one than the other is a real operational edge. Curious whether Fedica's audience intelligence covers decentralized platforms like Farcaster or Lens, or if the cross-platform view is scoped to the major centralized networks for now?

Report

10h ago

Fedica

Maker

@hazy0 hi Hazy,

Thanks for the question. We actually support multiple decentralized platforms (Mastodon, Bluesky, Pixelfed, BlackSky, EuroSky, and PeerTube .... and more coming soon) We currently do not support Farcaster nor Lens, although it's a possibility in the future depending on adoption and API integration capabilities of each platform

Report

10h ago

That's a more comprehensive decentralized list than I expected — Bluesky and Mastodon cover a lot of ground for the communities I work with. The Farcaster piece makes sense to stage; their API surface is still evolving and the core user base skews narrow enough that I'd rather see AT Protocol cross-posting nailed first. Appreciate the honest answer.

Report

2h ago

Fedica

Maker

@hazy0 my pleasure! Thanks for the follow up comment!

And yes, cross posting would be first for Farcaster and if we see traction then we can add our audience intelligence piece

Report

2h ago

'people back in your analytics' not follower counts is the right fight. when one fan follows me on x and bluesky, do you resolve them as one person or two?

Report

9h ago

Fedica

Maker

@andrewzakonov Great question. We think about this in two layers. At the analytics level, we’re focused on understanding the people and conversations behind the numbers, but the metrics themselves are still reported within each platform because each network has its own data model and attribution rules.

Long term, cross-platform identity resolution is definitely a direction we want because the real insight is understanding the person behind the interactions.

Report

8h ago

Cool product, and congrats on the launch @albattran

Genuine question: with 12+ networks and per-platform tailoring, how do you handle the analytics side when engagement metrics aren't comparable across platforms (a "like" on LinkedIn vs a repost on Bluesky vs a Mastodon boost)? Do you normalize those into one score, or keep them separate so you're not comparing apples to oranges?

Report

10h ago

Fedica

Maker

@aidan_codefox thanks for the great question, Aidan!

Some stats are added when uniform (e.g. followers stats sent our email reports) but for the most part we try to keep stats per platform since different platforms report different types of data (e.g. reposts, or link clicks or profile clicks)

But when it comes audience intelligence (e.g. identifying CEOs who follow you from Austin), these are platform specific (on the platforms that support them, e.g. X, Bluesky etc) and you need to connect with them on that platform itself anyway.

Report

10h ago

Noticed a reviewer mention they run Fedica alongside other tools just to compare directly, that kind of side by side evaluation is usually what ends up documented in G2/Capterra reviews, since it's hard for a prospect to get that comparison anywhere else. With 32 reviews already, have you found review platforms actually drive real trial signups, or is it more of a trust signal once someone's already evaluating you?

Report

9h ago

Fedica

Maker

@joe_kindness101 Great question. We've found they're mostly a trust signal. People often discover us through search, recommendations, or content first, then check G2 or Capterra to validate that we're a safe choice. The detailed comparisons are especially valuable because they answer questions we can't objectively answer ourselves. That said, we've definitely had some direct signups from review sites too, just not nearly as many as from our organic channels or SEO directly.

Report

9h ago

@jonwesselink That tracks with what we've seen too, review sites doing more validation work than top-of-funnel discovery. The "answers questions we can't objectively answer ourselves" point is spot on, especially for anything technical where a prospect wants to hear it from a peer, not the vendor. Did you find you had to actively prompt customers for reviews to get that detailed-comparison quality, or did users volunteer that kind of depth on their own?

Report

9h ago

Fedica

Maker

@joe_kindness101 Thanks Joe, for us, we time it with the help desk. When we notice a customer having a positive experience or sharing something helpful about how they use Fedica, we’ll encourage them to share that feedback publicly because it helps other teams evaluating tools and also helps us understand what we should keep building.

Report

9h ago

@jonwesselink That's a smart trigger point, tying it to a positive support interaction rather than just a generic "please review us" email blast after purchase. Support conversations probably surface way more specific, usable detail (how someone's actually using it) than a cold ask ever would. Do you find those support-prompted reviews read differently than ones you get from marketing pushes, more detailed or specific?

Report

9h ago

What is the biggest engineering challenge in merging 15 years of data with publishing a new pipeline?

Report

3h ago

Fedica

Maker

@thomas_digaetano Good question, Thomas!

Actually a lot of the data we deal goes back to 2006 (Twitter's inception) so it's more than 15 years :-)

I think the biggest advantage we have is having solid design decisions from the start, we spent a lot of time in the early years prototyping and selecting the right technology so that made things super easy when we rebuilt the infrastructure

With the technology part aside , I think the challenge for us was how to modernize the service and add a lot of new tools while making existing users feel home. We had focus groups and beta testers to provide feedback, but I also think critical was the speed in reacting to existing user complaints when the new changes were not working for them. At the end many users hate change but it is important to put yourself in their shoes to see how they use the service and make sure the changes are not making things more difficult

Report

3h ago

Prosed

Congratulations on the launch, @albattran ! 🎉 Fifteen years of audience intelligence behind a 2.0 is a rare kind of foundation.

A question from someone who spends her days with creators. When you surface a superfan who follows someone on three platforms, do you also show where that person actually engages most deeply? I'm thinking of creators deciding where to put a big announcement. Knowing who cares is one gift; knowing where they're actually listening feels like the second one.

Rooting for you today from another team launching alongside you!

Report

2h ago

Fedica

Maker

@rails thanks for the question Elise!

For your own followers, we have different views, including "top interactors", it is per platform (not aggregated). For analysis of other accounts we only show top followers (by follower count, not engagement). The manage section of Fedica is available for X, Bluesky, Mastodon and Pixelfed

Report

2h ago

The “Top Interactors” angle feels more useful than another reach dashboard. Knowing who actually keeps showing up is a better starting point for relationships than a bigger impressions number. How are you separating genuine interest from people who simply comment on everything?

Report

1h ago

Fedica

Maker

@ra5tadark good question, Rasul!

There are two parts to managing engagement, a) the inbox where you need to see each comment/reply/quote and respond to those that need to

b) measure the engagement, and with those you can view how many engagements each of them made, filter by type of engagement and also view their creds (followers etc)

More importantly, you can intersect all that with your audience, for example, you can find which of your followers is most engaged, or who doesn't engage with you

Report

14m ago

1 2 3 4

Previous Fedica Launches

Bluesky Analytics, Search & Growth ToolsFind accounts, track growth, sort followers & schedule posts

Launched on April 22nd, 2025

FedicaThe one AI social media powerhouse

Launched on September 9th, 2023

TweepsmapAnalyze, listen, engage & strategize Twitter growth with AI

Launched on July 21st, 2022

Forum Threads

p/fedica

•

1d ago

Have you ever clicked on a post because you couldn't ignore the hook...

...only to finish and realize it didn't actually say anything new?

Lately it feels like we're getting really good at optimizing how we say things, but not necessarily what we're saying.

p/fedica

•

4d ago

Social media was a town square, now it's like a collection of neighborhoods

For a long time, social media felt like one big town square.

Now it feels more like a collection of neighborhoods.

p/fedica

•

9d ago

Over the last few years, social media has become more fragmented.

People are choosing the platforms and communities where they feel most connected. Some are on X, others on Bluesky, LinkedIn, Threads, Mastodon, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and whatever comes next.

But something important gets lost when we only look at social through dashboards and numbers: the people behind the engagement.

View all