The community submitted 21 reviews to tell
us what they like about Electron, what Electron can do better, and
more.
5.0
Based on 21 reviews
Review Electron?
Review coverage here is too thin to say much beyond broad approval: the only available feedback is a set of founder ratings, with no written comments from founders and no user reviews at all. That means reviewers, narrowly speaking, signal a positive view of Electron, especially among makers of products like Steer, RightNow AI, and Blitzit, but they offer no concrete details on strengths, weaknesses, or tradeoffs in actual use.
+18
Summarized with AI
Pros
Cons
Replay QAAutonomous app testing for teams who ship at AI-speed
While wrapping up the Rust + Tauri 2.0 version, we hit a roadblock: dynamically opening new WebViewsWindows from target="_blank" links was almost impossible. Combined with the need for seamless cross-platform support on Windows (with WSL2) and macOS (with Colima), Electron became the clear path forward, flexible, powerful, and ready for the universal self-hosting challenge.
We chose Electron for our first Windows desktop app. It's great if you're familiar with web development, but sometimes it feels like we're stretching JavaScript beyond what it was meant for.
Electron makes it dead simple to ship a full-featured desktop app across Windows, macOS, and Linux using tech I already know — no need to maintain separate codebases.
What's great
cross-platform support (4)single codebase (1)reuse web technologies (3)
Electron made cross-platform distribution easy - we're able to run the desktop UI on Mac, Windows, and Linux thanks to the electron builder and runtime.
Life Minute Photos is a desktop application built with Javascript, CSS, and HTML and we couldn't have created such a high-quality and performant experience without Electron.
The Electron framework powers the Emoogle desktop app and allow us to reuse the same React typescript source code in both web and desktop (Windows, Mac).