Launching today
DueDocs
AI property contract review for Australian buyers and pros.
38 followers
AI property contract review for Australian buyers and pros.
38 followers
DueDocs is AI‑powered contract review for Australian property buyers, investors, and conveyancers. Upload a Contract of Sale or vendor statement to see key risks, negotiation angles, Voice Agent and AI Chat to answer any question, and suburb insights with source‑linked findings in under 5 minutes. Built for buyers at open homes and teams handling volume via bulk upload. First report free. Check out our sample: https://duedocs.com.au/sample Informational only, not legal advice.
@anuj_sachan1 fantastic.
disclosure regimes are genuinely different state to state in Australia - Section 32 is a Victoria thing, NSW has its own contract/disclosure requirements, and it's different again in QLD. does the model actually know which state's rules apply based on the document format and check against that state's specific requirements, or is the 40+ risk category scan more of a general pattern applied everywhere regardless of jurisdiction?
@galdayan Fair question, and you're right that disclosure regimes differ state to state.
We detect jurisdiction from the document itself before analysis: Section 32 / Sale of Land Act → VIC, Contract for Sale + vendor disclosure annexures / s10.7 → NSW, Form 30 → QLD, Form 2 → SA, and equivalents for WA, TAS, NT, and ACT.
The ~40 risk categories are universal — title, easements, planning, building compliance, body corporate/OC, outgoings, contract terms — because buyers care about the same things everywhere. State-specific rules layer on top: statutory charges, cooling-off periods, owner-builder warranty periods, planning overlay systems, and authority names. We also guard against cross-state errors (e.g. GAIC on an NSW doc).
This is AI-assisted due diligence to help you spot issues faster and ask your conveyancer better questions, not a replacement for one.
One thing that would help a lot is comparing clauses side by side against a standard template so I can see at a glance what is unusual or missing. Even a simple diff view would make negotiation prep faster when reviewing contracts at open homes.
@cemreb6dj Thanks, I really like this idea.
One of the tricky parts is that there isn't a single "standard" contract in Australia. Every state has its own contract and disclosure requirements, and even within the same state it's common to see additional special conditions added by the seller.
That said, I completely agree with the underlying idea. As a buyer, you don't necessarily want to read every clause, you want to know what's different, what's unusual, and what deserves your attention.
A "what's changed" or comparison view is something we've talked about internally because it would make reviewing contracts much quicker, especially when you're moving fast after an open home. Thanks for sharing it, it's exactly the kind of feedback that helps us decide what to build next.