Every AI-built app that turned out messy had one thing in common: no plan before the first prompt. I built this after spending an afternoon trying to get Claude Code to build a simple dashboard. I reworked it 9 or 10 times. Kept adding more detail. The output kept drifting. Eventually I realized: the AI was doing its best with nothing. No clear scope, no feature priority, no boundaries. It was filling in the gaps however it wanted. That's the trap. Most builders jump straight into the coding tool because writing a spec feels like overhead. Draftlytic makes it take about two minutes instead. Best fit: solo builders and indie devs using Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable, or v0 who keep ending up with apps that are almost right but never quite right. The gap is almost always the spec, not the tool. A couple of things I would love honest feedback on: Is the export format actually useful when you paste it into your AI coding tool? Does it change how the first prompt lands? Which features matter most for your workflow: the AI Scan, the PRD Workshop chat, the Implementation Plan, or something else? (If you want to go deeper on AI Scan: https://draftlytic.com/blog/ai-s...) Thanks for taking the time to look. Building this solo from Ireland, and Product Hunt days still feel significant. https://draftlytic.com/?utm_sour...

Draftlytic

Stop re-prompting. Start with a spec.

Stop re-prompting. Start with a spec.