Framer AI AgentsDesign and publish professional sites with AI
CVCheck
A CV scorer that reads like a recruiter, not a checklist
7 followers
A CV scorer that reads like a recruiter, not a checklist
7 followers
Most ATS checkers count keyword matches and call it a score. CVCheck scores 7 things recruiters actually care about, impact, ATS fit, red flags, career story, format, credibility, and shows exactly which lines are costing you interviews. Free, no signup.
Hey Product Hunt. Built this after my own job search went nowhere for months. Every "ATS checker" I tried gave me a fake match percentage and nothing I could actually do with it.
So I built one that scores 7 things separately, first impression, achievement impact, ATS compatibility, red flags, career story, formatting, credibility, and points to the exact lines hurting your score instead of just a number.
Free to run, no signup. Pro is normally €5 one-time, €1.99 right now. Premium is €10/mo normally, €5.99 right now, adds job matching and cover letters.
Genuinely want feedback on whether the free/paid split feels fair. Happy to talk through the scoring logic or the stack, Next.js, Claude API, Stripe.
how does it actually score impact when most bullet points on resumes just list duties without numbers to measure against
@hamzagayricztz Kind of the point: a bullet that just lists a duty with no number scores low on Impact, and that low score is the signal, not a gap.
It weighs three things. Quantification, it counts how many bullets have a measurable result versus how many are just "responsible for X." Verb strength, "led/built/cut" reads as ownership, "assisted with" reads as passive. And outcome vs task, did the bullet say what happened because of you, or just what you were assigned.
So it's not scoring your numbers against a benchmark. It's checking whether you gave it anything measurable at all, and flagging where you didn't. Usually the fix is reframing a duty into an outcome, even a rough "resolved ~50 tickets/week" beats a bare duty.
Ran my resume through it and the line-by-line red flag callouts actually nailed a few things I'd been ignoring. Nice that it doesn't make you sign up just to see the real feedback.
@memetidp8 Good one, and it fits how people actually iterate, one bullet at a time wondering if the change was worth it.
The thing I'd have to solve: the overall /100 is holistic enough that rewording a single bullet barely moves it, so a plain score-vs-score diff might underwhelm ("71 to 72?"). The real signal is at the dimension level, Impact and ATS especially, so a comparison would need to show what moved there, not just the top number.
Genuinely considering it. Since you'd use it, would you want two full versions side by side, or more of a "tweak one bullet, watch the score update live" thing? Pretty different builds and I'm not sure which people actually reach for.