Launched this week
CAB by SaaSToAgent
Project memory and navigation layer for Agentic coding.
10 followers
Project memory and navigation layer for Agentic coding.
10 followers
The Context Architecture Bundle is a project memory and navigation layer for agentic coding. It gives every AI coding agent the structure needed to restart cleanly, understand the system, make changes in the right place, and close the session without losing context. It reduces dependence on fragile chat history, prevents architecture drift, saves tokens, preserves context-window space, and gives future agents a clear map before editing code.
Hi Product Hunt,
I’m Raghavendra, and I lead the research lab at SaaSToAgent.
While building SaaSToAgent, we kept running into the same problem with coding agents on larger projects: each new session could read the code, but it still had to rediscover the system before making a safe change.
Which component owns this workflow? Which decisions are intentional? What must not change? Which tests actually prove the change is correct? What did the previous session already do?
We created Context Architecture Bundle to make that context durable.
CAB is an open-source project context and navigation layer for teams using Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, or similar coding agents. It keeps the current project snapshot, critical constraints, architecture maps, component boundaries, test intent, decisions, and session handoffs in a structured form alongside the project.
The goal is not to make agents autonomous by default. It is to reduce repeated architecture archaeology and help every new agent session start with the context needed to work more safely.
We built this for our own work first, then separated it into an open-source bundle because this is a recurring problem that should not need to be solved from scratch by every team.
I’d value feedback from teams working with coding agents on real projects: what is the first important thing an agent tends to lose between sessions - architecture, decisions, ownership, validation context, or handoff history?