CloudSaver AI scans your AWS Cost Explorer CSV for wasted spend in seconds. No API keys, no signup, no data leaving your browser. Detects zombie resources, over-provisioned EC2, idle load balancers, stale EBS snapshots, unused Elastic IPs, and S3 tier mismatches. Built for indie hackers and small SaaS teams paying $200-5000/month to AWS. Free scan now. Pro (auto-scans + alerts) is on the roadmap — leave your email on the site to get early access.
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for CloudSaver AI
Maker
Update: CloudSaver is now live with PayPal checkout. 🎉
The CSV scanner stays free. The $19 Pro Audit (human-reviewed waste report, delivered in 3 business days) is now purchasable — upload your bill, pay, email the CSV, get the report.
If you want to see what it looks like first, there's a sample report on the site.
Report
the fact that everything runs client-side without uploading your cost data is a really thoughtful call, especially for smaller teams who are wary of yet another SaaS tool asking for credentials. loving the focused scope too.
Report
Maker
@egemenakmazc0c Thanks Egeman! That was actually the #1 design decision — I kept seeing tools that want read-only IAM roles or full account access, and even though I understand why, it's a big ask for a 10-second check-in.
The trade-off is I can't do continuous monitoring (no backend = no cron jobs), but for a "quick health check" vibe I think the browser-only model works. Curious to hear your thoughts on where the line should be — at what point does a tool become useful enough to justify giving it API access?
Update: CloudSaver is now live with PayPal checkout. 🎉
The CSV scanner stays free. The $19 Pro Audit (human-reviewed waste report, delivered in 3 business days) is now purchasable — upload your bill, pay, email the CSV, get the report.
If you want to see what it looks like first, there's a sample report on the site.
the fact that everything runs client-side without uploading your cost data is a really thoughtful call, especially for smaller teams who are wary of yet another SaaS tool asking for credentials. loving the focused scope too.
@egemenakmazc0c Thanks Egeman! That was actually the #1 design decision — I kept seeing tools that want read-only IAM roles or full account access, and even though I understand why, it's a big ask for a 10-second check-in.
The trade-off is I can't do continuous monitoring (no backend = no cron jobs), but for a "quick health check" vibe I think the browser-only model works. Curious to hear your thoughts on where the line should be — at what point does a tool become useful enough to justify giving it API access?