As a former regulator and co-founder of a mobile payments startup, this one's a headscratcher. Is this a less profitable version of HigherOne? Is it Simple for a smaller market and four years too late? Do they think there'll be enough prepaid interchange to pay for rising customer acquisition costs, loyalty programs, and infrastructure? This has become a fairly mature and competitive market - they're going up against WalMart and AmEx, and it seems like a company with such a troubled history chose to pivot into an extremely tough spot.
And then there's the future regulatory headaches that are coming down the pike. It's unclear how much of the advertising about fees on the website would survive Reg DD scrutiny if this were a debit card. It's not. Like Simple, it's a general purpose reloadable (GPR) prepaid card. There aren't substantive regulations on disclosure yet, although the CFPB has announced rules coming in this area: http://files.consumerfinance.gov...
Still trying to figure out how this is going to work out well.
@megerman Hey Mark! We don't make [EDIT: profit] on interchange, and don't plan to [EDIT: we get the standard interchange income for issuing banks as revenue]. All of that money goes back into the Treats program.
As far as fees, we have a pretty comprehensive set of disclosures on our site, all of which we are presently waiving (and hope to eliminate entirely as we gain traction).
@21echoes That's not too surprising, given the relative bargaining power with your issuer - most startups can't really control much of those economics. But not taking any interchange and remitting it all to the networks or your issuer, that seems off.
Still, the formula for a GPR is pretty straightfoward. Fees + Interchange + Float - Customer Acquisition - Overhead - Fraud = profit. Sounds like you have no interchange revenues, a costly loyalty program, and there's no way you're going to make money off float given what interest rates are. This isn't rocket science - this is just the very straightforward economics of a well-understood product that anyone can buy off a j-hook at a WalMart, CVS, etc.
Breakage can't save this model either - escheatment takes care of that. LevelUp tried losing money on interchange and making it up on loyalty, but well, they quickly learned that didn't work. So I just don't get the economics at play for this product. Unless this whole thing is a loss leader to move students onto higher-margin financial tools, consider me puzzled.
Cover is hiring. We make money on every transaction. I highly recommend it.
@megerman Sorry, to be clear: we don't make *profit* on interchange, we re-invest it in Treats (our rewards program). Edited my comment above accordingly.
@mhdempsey Agree. Would love for a Clinkle investor to come in here and respond re: economics of the model.
Report
On the homepage they have a section saying "We're not into fees", but a quick look at their agreement has a long list of fees, including fees to add money to your card https://www.clinkle.com/legal/ba...
- $0.50 per transaction to add money via qualified debit card
- $0.30 + 2.9% per transaction to add money via non-qualified debit card
- $1 ATM fees
- 3% international transaction fees
Are these fees common with prepaid debit cards? I can't see someone being too excited to realize that, in some cases, they only have $485 to spend after loading up $500.
Think this is a good pivot for two reasons: 1) the college focus is a new twist on a very old space, the college town discount card, so you don't need to re-educate your target market; and 2) sending a "free" debit card with absolutely no fees feels like you are getting something for nothing.
@dannyjespinoza I think it's probably cool for the Stanford crowd, but not for the ramen college kids. I was so strapped for cash in college that I can't imagine ever just sending a friend money for the sake of it.
Can I send them an invitation to share a cheap bottle of whiskey and a box of Kraft mac & cheese with Clinkle? Can parents deposit $ directly onto a Clinkle card as easily as they could with a simple online banking transfer?
@Moore They have fees to use the card at an ATM, but not to use it as credit. It's a debit card technically since it's backed by a funded account but I think they want you to use it in place of a credit card, not as a bank account. They have a fee to value-load from a credit card, but not by ACH from a bank account. That makes sense because loading from a credit card would likely cost them 3% to Amex/Visa/Stripe/whatever. The $20 liquidation fee is lame. They also have foreign transaction fees, which is fairly normal for mainstream credit cards.
@bcherry I spent a good amount of time with that copy. We tried to communicate the facts clearly:
1) We don't want to charge fees. That would be lame for us as Clinkle members, too.
2) while we've never charged anyone a fee (yet) it seemed important to be upfront that that approach doesn't scale
3) if everything goes well, we can remove fees forever
So it's a card that... Gives you rewards? I mean... Isn't that like every card out there?
Why... Why would I use this over my Amex or another card?
Their pitch is... Incomplete. Flat. Unappealing. No reason to switch.
I'm just sad about the whole Clinkle episode.
These comments are gonna be a shit show.
Report
Simple clone with some ambiguous social rewards program? Pretty seriously underwhelming for a company that's commanded so much hype.
Startup Challenge
Blurt
Clinkle
Cover
Clinkle
Cover
Clinkle
CB Insights
Product Hunt Regular
Octane AI
Aura Frame
Clinkle
Backchannel
Startup TV
Clinkle
Startup TV
Codacy Quality
Looksy for iMessage
Looksy for iMessage
Aura Frame
Clinkle
Octane AI