What do people think of chatgpt.js?
The community submitted 2 reviews to tell
us what they like about chatgpt.js, what chatgpt.js can do better, and
more.
What do you think about chatgpt.js?
Leave a rating or review for the community
5/5All time (2 reviews)
1/5
Recently (0 reviews)2 Reviews
Congratulations! What are some unique features or aspects of your project that set it apart from competitors? How do you plan to stay ahead in the market?
Adam Lui@adamlui
@nikolai_persiianov Thank you! Currently there are no competitors for client-side ChatGPT libraries (a ton of API wrappers exist in many languages for back-end) so that is likely partially responsible for the great traction thus far.
Apart from being unique in existence, a lot of the functions are quite easy to use but very powerful.
For example, chatgpt.alert() is used to easily trigger alerts to auto-updates when apps get updated, resulting in beautiful alerts by simply supplying a title, msg & named button function as arguments:
... that also drive traffic where you want (GitHub, blog, etc.) when you include links, to increase social activity on other platforms.
Also the needs of users are used to build out next features. For example, someone needed it to render HTML, and the function was added within days) and because it's open-source yet very actively maintained, that keeps it ahead in the market at light speed (compare this to issues raised in some other repos take up to months to resolve)
... that also drive traffic where you want (GitHub, blog, etc.) when you include links, to increase social activity on other platforms.
Also the needs of users are used to build out next features. For example, someone needed it to render HTML, and the function was added within days) and because it's open-source yet very actively maintained, that keeps it ahead in the market at light speed (compare this to issues raised in some other repos take up to months to resolve)Share
First impression of your site: the font size is a little big, making the content feel more crowded than I personally prefer. However, that is a minor thing compared to the deeply appreciated no-nonsense and to the point documentation that site provides and the links at the end to some useful tools all sans any of the typical BS requiring I use Chrome instead to install the web extension for it that won't run on Firefox or nagging about the change in Chrome's manifest version for 12 paragraphs I don't really care enough to read since I am not using it anyway. Instead, clear writing and a product that targets common userscript managers, with friends that provide useful functionality as is.
