Carver
Find your next business idea — with an AI plan to build it.
11 followers
Find your next business idea — with an AI plan to build it.
11 followers
Carver turns real Hong Kong consumer pain points into buildable businesses. It surfaces recurring pain points from public online discussion, quantifies each with a market analysis, then generates a complete AI business plan — MVP spec, six-month cash flow, acquisition channels and launch steps — so you go from raw insight to a product you can actually build.
Most founders stall on the same question: what should I build? So they copy an overseas app that doesn't fit the local market, or brainstorm ideas nobody actually wants — and quietly give up a few months later.
I built Carver (https://carverhk.com/en) around a different starting point: evidence.
Every day, Hong Kong people describe their real frustrations in public online discussion — the same complaints, over and over. That repetition is the clearest demand signal there is. Carver collects those recurring pain points, hand-curates them weekly, and scores each one on severity, market gap, and willingness-to-pay.
But the part I'm most proud of is what comes next.
For any pain point, Carver generates a complete AI business plan:
- a concrete MVP spec
- a six-month cash-flow estimate
- low-cost acquisition channels
- a step-by-step launch sequence
So instead of stopping at "here's an idea," you get "here's exactly how to build it this month."
Why this is hard to copy: anyone can bolt an LLM onto an idea list. The moat is the curated, quantified dataset of real Hong Kong demand feeding it — built specifically for the local market, in Traditional Chinese.
It's freemium: browse curated pain points and full analysis samples free; Pro (HKD 168/mo, ~US$21) unlocks the full library and unlimited AI plans.
Would genuinely love feedback from other founders — especially on the plan-generation output. What would make it something you'd actually act on?
How does Carver decide which pain points are worth a full plan versus just noise, and is there a way to filter by industry or budget range before it generates the whole playbook?
@cemreivaq
Thanks for the question!
It's a two-stage filter: a pain point first has to clear a volume threshold — not just reply count, but signals like the
thread's likes/dislikes and the likes on individual comments, so we can tell a genuinely shared frustration from a one-off gripe. Whatever clears that bar is then hand-picked by us, so nothing is auto-published; a real person decides it's a genuine, recurring problem.
Each one also shows its supporting evidence so you can judge the signal yourself.
On filtering: no industry split, but every pain point is tagged by category. Budget works a bit differently — it's not a
filter on the pain points, it's a setting on the plan. You set your budget before generating, and the playbook is tailored to it. So the problem stays the same for everyone; the plan is personalized to you. :)
How does Carver actually pull the online discussion data, and is it limited to Hong Kong sources or can I point it at other regions too?
@naciyexf8i
Thanks for asking!
We continuously monitor local online forums for what people are genuinely complaining about, then filter, group the recurring ones together into a single pain point, and hand-pick the ones worth publishing.
For now our scope is Hong Kong only. We'd love to expand to other regions down the line, but with limited resources we're choosing to do one market really well first. Being born and raised in Hong Kong, we also understand the real local pain points : the context, the culture, the specifics — better than we could for a place we don't live in. So focusing here lets us keep the quality high rather than spreading thin.
Appreciate the question — happy to share more!
The Hong Kong focus is a nice touch, feels grounded in actual local complaints instead of generic startup advice. Surprised how quickly it pulled together a rough cash flow I could actually read.
@aynurgrmhq23
Thank you, this really means a lot! That's exactly what we were going for: grounded in what Hong Kong people are
actually complaining about, not recycled startup advice.
And glad the cash flow landed well, we wanted it to be something you could read and act on in a minute, not a spreadsheet you need an accountant for.
Finally a tool that mines reddit-style pain points in HK and hands you a realistic cash flow instead of generic startup fluff. Loved how the MVP spec actually mapped back to the quote clusters it pulled from.
@ilan1017353
Thank you so much, this made our day! Mapping the MVP spec back to the actual quote clusters was the part we sweated over most, because we wanted every recommendation to trace back to something real people actually said, not our assumptions. And yeah, the realistic cash flow over generic fluff is the whole point for us. Really grateful you noticed the details and took the time to share this!