AI agents fetch your site with no browser and no JavaScript, and often get almost nothing. Paste a URL: AXRAY fetches it the way they do, scores it out of 100 across 70 published checks, and hands you an ordered fix list with the exact lines to paste. Free, no account, about two seconds. There is also a CLI for your pipeline and an MCP server, so you can ask Claude or ChatGPT directly. The whole rubric is public, weights included.
Hey Product Hunt 👋
I built AXRAY because I could not answer a simple question about my own site: when someone asks ChatGPT about it, what does ChatGPT actually get?
Search engines run a full browser. AI agents mostly do not. They fetch the HTML and read what is there — no JavaScript, no rendering, no second chance. So a site that looks perfect to Google can arrive as an empty shell.
To find out how common that is, I measured 292 popular sites against the same rubric. The median scored 68 out of 100. Only 8 scored above 85. 45 blocked AI crawlers outright, and another 72 half-blocked them without, I suspect, meaning to. That study is public and the raw numbers are on the site.
What AXRAY does:
- Paste a URL, get a score out of 100 across 70 published checks, in about two seconds. No account, no card.
- An ordered fix list — what to change, why it matters, and the exact lines to paste.
- A command-line version (npx axray-cli) so it can run in CI.
- An MCP server, so you can add it to Claude or ChatGPT and just ask "is my pricing page readable by an agent?" wherever you already work. Building a tool that measures agent experience and leaving it un-callable by an agent would have been embarrassing.
Two honest things:
- The rubric is published in full, weights included. If you disagree with a check you can see exactly what it cost you and argue with it.
- It scores its own site with the same rubric and shows the result. It is not 100.
I would genuinely like to know where the rubric is wrong. Scan something and tell me what it got wrong about your page — that is the feedback I want most.