Framer AI AgentsDesign and publish professional sites with AI
Anoto
Visual QA feedback for websites
9 followers
Visual QA feedback for websites
9 followers
Anoto is a simple way to review websites and leave feedback directly on the page. Paste a URL, click anywhere, add comments, and share clear feedback with your team or client. No screenshots, messy Slack threads, or vague notes like “the thing under the button.” You can also export feedback to tools like Linear.
Interactive
Free Options
Launch Team / Built With
How does the pricing work for teams, and is there a cap on how many comments or pages you can review on the free plan? Also curious if comments update live if the website changes after the review starts.
@rfangldemirzy
Great question! The free plan is meant to let you run a real review: 3 active projects, up to 5 pages per project, and 10 pin comments per page. You can also share with collaborators on the free plan.
For teams or ongoing work, paid plans remove the page/comment caps. Pro is $34 one-time for one project, and Membership is $29/mo for up to 15 active projects. The full comparison table is on the Anoto homepage.
On website changes: Anoto reviews the live site, not just a static screenshot. Existing comments stay tied to the page/element/spot where they were made, and we keep the original context so feedback does not lose meaning. If the site changes a lot or an element disappears, a pin may not perfectly follow the new layout automatically, but the comment and its context are still preserved.
Would love to see a screen recording option built in. Sometimes the feedback I need to give is about motion or a bug that only shows up after a few interactions, and clicking pin by pin misses the flow. Even a short 30 second capture linked to the comment would save me a ton of explaining.
@niyaziktayvflx
Totally agree. That’s exactly the use case I had in mind, so screen recording is included on the paid plans.
Pins are great for precise visual feedback, but motion, hover states, multi-step bugs, and “watch what happens after I click this” issues need a recording. The goal is to let you combine both: pin comments for specific spots, and screen recordings when the feedback is about a flow.
Love how clean the click-to-comment flow is, just point and type without breaking focus. The Linear export is a smart touch for getting feedback straight into the workflow where it actually gets used.
@sat477669931529
Thank you, that means a lot. The whole idea for me was to keep feedback as close as possible to the moment you notice it: click the thing, write the note, and keep moving.
And yes, Linear export was a big one. Feedback only matters if it actually makes it into the workflow, so I wanted that handoff to be painless. The Linear issue can include the comment, page/device context, replies, attachments, screen recordings, and contextual screenshots too, so the ticket has the context attached instead of becoming a vague note.
You can also import templates, so repeated QA/review flows don’t have to start from scratch every time.