Using AI already carries obligations. We give you the starting point: indicative role, risk level and exportable documentation in minutes. EU Regulation 2024/1689 requires companies and professionals to document, assess and manage their AI use. 90% of SMEs don't know if it applies to them, what role they play as Deployer or Provider. AICONTEXT can generate in minutes an indicative self-assessment draft with regulatory role, risk level and measures to consider.
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for AI Context | Smart, Safe, Scalable
Maker
📌
I'm Ricky, founder of AICONTEXT (Barcelona).
Deadline: August 2026.
EU Regulation 2024/1689 requires companies and professionals to document, assess and manage their AI use. 90% of SMEs don't know if it applies to them, what role they play as Deployer or Provider, or where to start without incurring large legal costs from day one.
What we solve:
A documented starting point in minutes — a self-assessment draft with your estimated regulatory role, risk level, and next steps. No lawyer needed to begin.
Need to go further? Our Marketplace connects you directly with vetted legal/technical specialists that can help you document and validate your Ai context use — no cold pitches, no blind proposals, no commissions.
Since Feb 2025, Art. 4 requires verifiable AI training for your team.
Our LMS gives certified, always-updated training with downloadable proof — one year license.
Why it's real:
Specialists across 7 countries already on the marketplace.
13 EU AI Act sections covered per brief. 100% EU-hosted data.
Art. 50 transparency built in from day one.
Building a layer for a more intelligent, safe and scalable European AI.
Start your self-assessment — no credit card → aicontext.eu
Report
Nice that you tackle the EU AI Act paperwork gap for SMEs. One feature that would really help: a simple side-by-side comparison view showing the indicative role and risk level next to a checklist of practical compliance measures, so users can see at a glance what steps remain before they finalize their documentation.
Report
Maker
@ned_kettering Thanks. We actually already have this implemented by default
In the brief editor you get the indicative role + risk level right at the top, with a checklist sidebar showing exactly which sections/compliance items are done vs. still pending (with a completion %). Take a look and let me know if it matches what you had in mind, or if you meant something more granular (e.g. checklist items tied to specific legal obligations rather than brief sections). I will be happy to share a PRO license for you to check and try.
Among other features as data evidence, log process:
And guidence:
Report
Ran it on a couple of projects and the indicative deployer role plus risk level came back surprisingly fast and matched what I would have written manually. Documentation export is a real time saver.
Report
Maker
@mercer_yan Thanks Janessa! Great to hear the classification matched your manual read, that's the bar we hold it to internally too. Glad the export is saving you time.
Report
love how the output stays structured around the three things regulators actually want to see, role, risk, and measures, instead of dumping a generic compliance wall of text
Report
Maker
@berkrat9 Thanks Berk! That's the whole idea....Smart. Safe. Scalable it is the layer we are buidling for an innovative EU AI. We focus on role, risk, and measures so that's what stays front and center instead of a generic compliance wall of text driving to confusion and SME's not being ready for a real inspection. Rgds
Nice that you tackle the EU AI Act paperwork gap for SMEs. One feature that would really help: a simple side-by-side comparison view showing the indicative role and risk level next to a checklist of practical compliance measures, so users can see at a glance what steps remain before they finalize their documentation.
@ned_kettering Thanks. We actually already have this implemented by default
In the brief editor you get the indicative role + risk level right at the top, with a checklist sidebar showing exactly which sections/compliance items are done vs. still pending (with a completion %). Take a look and let me know if it matches what you had in mind, or if you meant something more granular (e.g. checklist items tied to specific legal obligations rather than brief sections). I will be happy to share a PRO license for you to check and try.
Among other features as data evidence, log process:
And guidence:
Ran it on a couple of projects and the indicative deployer role plus risk level came back surprisingly fast and matched what I would have written manually. Documentation export is a real time saver.
@mercer_yan Thanks Janessa! Great to hear the classification matched your manual read, that's the bar we hold it to internally too. Glad the export is saving you time.
love how the output stays structured around the three things regulators actually want to see, role, risk, and measures, instead of dumping a generic compliance wall of text
@berkrat9 Thanks Berk! That's the whole idea....Smart. Safe. Scalable it is the layer we are buidling for an innovative EU AI. We focus on role, risk, and measures so that's what stays front and center instead of a generic compliance wall of text driving to confusion and SME's not being ready for a real inspection. Rgds