AIF is the cryptographic governance spine around your AI agents. Three pillars (Identity, Trust, Intent): every action gets a signed intent declaration, lands in a tamper-evident audit chain, and becomes a credential a regulator can verify. Self-hosted in on your instance, build in Europe, your keys, no vendor in the loop. Model-agnostic (Anthropic, OpenAI, Mistral, local). Compliance built in: EU AI Act Article 12, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF. The proof sits in the audit chain, not the slide deck.
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for Adaptive Intelligence Fabric
Wispr Flow: Dictation That Works EverywhereStop typing. Start speaking. 4x faster.
Promoted
Maker
📌
When a regulator asks what your AI did last quarter, what do you hand them? For most teams it's application logs and a hope.
I've sat on both sides of that table: advising boards on the EU AI Act, and building the products that have to satisfy it. The gap was always the same. AI systems make thousands of decisions, and almost none of them are provable after the fact.
So we built AIF as a spine, not another agent. Every action your AI takes gets a signed intent declaration before it runs, lands in a tamper-evident audit chain, and can be handed to a regulator as a credential they verify themselves.
It's self-hosted, so the evidence never leaves your infrastructure, and it wraps whatever model you already use.
The part I'm proudest of isn't a feature. You can try to break the tamper-evidence yourself and watch it hold. Trust isn't something we ask you to take on faith. It's something the audit chain proves.
The systems that survive a regulator are the ones that knew they'd be asked.
If you're running AI agents in a regulated setting, what does your audit trail look like right now?