Ask an AI about Google's ad stack and you mostly get blog posts, rephrased. Ad Insider answers only from primary sources: 295 Google patents and 357 exhibits filed in US v. Google — 652 documents. Every answer arrives signed — patent numbers, exhibit IDs, original PDFs one click away. A deep mode splits hard questions into parts and checks the result against the sources with a second model. Free, no signup, six languages. Connects to Claude over MCP.
Framer AI AgentsDesign and publish professional sites with AI
Promoted
Maker
📌
Hi Product Hunt 👋
I've spent six years on the publisher side of Google's ad stack — AdX, AdSense, MCM. The same thing kept happening: you ask a straightforward question — what margin does Google take, why did this inventory stop filling, what exactly makes traffic "invalid" — and you get a help-centre page that answers everything except the question.
Then the antitrust case put Google's internal documents into the open. Real numbers on auction mechanics and on the share kept at each step. Together with Google's own patents describing how invalid traffic is detected, that's a picture no public documentation contains.
So I collected the primary sources — 295 patents and 357 exhibits from US v. Google, 652 documents — and built an analyst on top of them. It answers only from those documents and shows you which ones. Every claim carries a patent number or an exhibit ID, and the original PDF is one click away.
What's inside:
• Quick answers (~10 s), and a deep mode (~1 min) that splits the question into parts, searches each separately, then checks the result against the sources with a second model
• The full catalogue of 652 documents, searchable
• A long read on what the case actually exposed about the ad stack
• An MCP connection, so Claude can query the same base from your own conversation — the access code is NVUK-94TZ, help yourself
• Six languages
Free, no signup.
Two honest caveats: the model answers from the documents rather than from my opinion, so where the base is thin it says so instead of inventing. And this is independent research — I'm not affiliated with Google.
I'd like the hard questions. If you work with AdX, AdSense or anti-fraud, ask it something you already know the answer to, and tell me where it falls short.
— Andrey