Launching today

acipta.ai

Launching today

115 AI agents that produce audit-proof compliance evidence

2 followers

115 AI agents that produce audit-proof compliance evidence

2 followers

Visit website

Most compliance tools give you a dashboard and an interpretation. acipta gives you evidence. 115 AI agents scan across SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, WCAG, EU AI Act and Privacy — from one canonical control catalog, so you collect evidence once and project it across every framework. Every verdict is cryptographically signed at write time and replays byte-identical for 5 years. Low-confidence findings route to a named human reviewer, not a black box. $99/mo., all 7 suites, through Q1 2027.

Free Options

Launch tags:SaaS•Artificial Intelligence•Security

Launch Team / Built With

Framer AI AgentsDesign and publish professional sites with AI

Promoted

Maker

📌

Hi Product Hunt — I'm VJ, founder of acipta. I spent 25 years on the receiving end of compliance audits. Enterprise architecture at DHS/CBP. Federal programs through NIST RMF to ATO at VA and USDA. A GovTech consultancy I founded and sold. Every one of them ended the same way: six weeks reassembling evidence a tool had supposedly been collecting all year, half of it screenshots with timestamps nobody could verify. That's the actual problem. Most compliance software produces an interpretation of your posture — a score, a chart, a green check. An auditor can't defend an interpretation. They need an artifact: this control, this input, this verdict, this signature, this date. So acipta signs at the agent execution layer. When one of our 115 agents reaches a verdict, that verdict is cryptographically signed at write time against pinned inputs, and it replays byte-identical five years later. Not collected and signed after the fact — signed at the moment of judgment. And because everything projects from one canonical control catalog, you collect evidence once and it lands across SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, WCAG, EU AI Act and Privacy at the same time. Where AI judgment is involved we don't pretend it's certain. Findings under our confidence floor route to a named human reviewer, and that review becomes part of the signed record. Early access is $99/mo for all seven suites through Q1 2027. I'd most like to hear from people who've sat through an audit and know where the bodies are buried. What broke for you — and what would you need to see before you'd put signed AI output in front of an auditor?

Report

9h ago

Forum Threads

p/acipta-ai

•

9h ago

Any advice is welcome for our product launch - acipta.ai

An agent inventory is a snapshot of the present. Governance of consequential automated decisions is a question about the past: which agent acted, what permissions did it hold at that moment, which controls applied then, what evidence did it rely on, was an exception made, who approved it. Permissions change. Models get deprecated. Policies get revised. The agent itself is rewritten. A governance posture that documents current state has, by construction, no answer to any question about a decision made before the last change which is to say, no answer to any question a regulator is likely to ask.

This is the same problem acipta was already built to solve for human compliance decisions, arriving at much larger scale from a different direction. That is a genuinely fortunate position for a company to be in, and it is not an accident: the architecture was designed around the durability of the record rather than the convenience of the workflow, which makes it indifferent to whether the decider was a person or a process.

View all