Launching today
Revibe — Your codebase, fully understood
Helping Agents and Human Orchesterators read the same notes.
14 followers
Helping Agents and Human Orchesterators read the same notes.
14 followers
AI agents write your code. You're still accountable when it breaks. The problem? You and your agents aren't on the same page. Revibe analyzes any repository in under 5 minutes. For you — an interactive interface with architecture maps, execution flows, and multi-level docs. For your agents — a structured agent_context.json that auto-syncs on every push. Same codebase, same understanding. Connect your GitHub repo and it stays in sync on every push. Human and agent, finally on the same page.
Search This Image Twitter Bot
Burner
The gap between "you see architecture, your agent sees syntax" is real — I've felt that friction when trying to onboard an agent mid-project and realizing my mental model of the codebase just doesn't translate. Curious how the agent_context.json handles repos that are actively messy or in transition, where the architecture is more aspirational than actual. That feels like exactly the moment you need shared context most, but also when it's hardest to generate something trustworthy.
Search This Image Twitter Bot
@wcrtr Thanks Will. You are not alone. At the speed of current development, it is humanly impossible to be up-to-date on the syntax that went in — that friction is exactly why we built this.
To your question about messy/transitional repos - Revibe analyzes what's actually in the code, not what the README claims. So if the architecture is half-migrated, that's what shows up in the maps and flows. It's an as-is model, not an aspirational one. That honesty is actually what makes the shared context trustworthy — both you and your agent see the same reality, not a polished version of it.
For repos in active transition, the GitHub sync keeps the context updated on every push, so the model evolves with the code.
This is pretty cool Selva.
I have been so far manually asking claude to view my code base and create a codebase_digest.md file so that it can refer to it, and also after major changes to update it. This seems like a more elegant approach to the same.
I do hope you make this as an openclaw skill so that all the folks who are using openclaw to manage their coding agents can make use of this better.
Search This Image Twitter Bot
@vijayanands Thanks Vijay! That's exactly the workflow we're replacing — the manual "paste your codebase into Claude and ask for a summary" loop. Revibe does it in one shot and keeps it in sync automatically via GitHub App, so the context stays fresh on every push.
Thanks for the suggestion on the openclaw skill. That's a great idea - Adding it to the roadmap.
Really interesting product.
Automatically generating technical flows, architecture diagrams, and user flows from a repository is useful.
I can see this being especially valuable for fractional CTOs, software architects, and developers trying to quickly understand unfamiliar projects, otherwise they would have to go though multiple files.
Since you've already analyzed many open-source repositories, it might be interesting to reach out to those maintainers and suggest Revibe as a documentation tool for their projects. It could be a great way for teams to keep architectural docs up to date.
Search This Image Twitter Bot
@timoth_dev Thanks Timoth! Fractional CTOs is a great call — they're dropped into unfamiliar codebases constantly and need to get up to speed fast. I've been there. Done that :-)
Love the idea on reaching out to OSS maintainers. We already have 40+ open-source projects analyzed in the gallery — making that a value-add for maintainers as living documentation is something we're exploring. Appreciate the suggestion!
another amazing product! @selvaprakash
Search This Image Twitter Bot