Hallucina-Gen

Spot where your LLM might make mistakes on documents

33 followers

Spot where your LLM might make mistakes on documents

33 followers

Using LLMs to summarize or answer questions from documents? We auto-analyze your PDFs and prompts, and produce test inputs likely to trigger hallucinations. Built for AI developers to validate outputs, test prompts, and squash hallucinations early.

Free Options

Launch tags:Developer Tools•Artificial Intelligence•Security

Launch Team / Built With

Render: Get up to $100K in startup creditsThe fastest way to launch and scale your startup in the cloud

Promoted

Maker

📌

Hi fellow makers, We’re Actualization.AI, and our mission is to make AI safer, more accurate, and genuinely helpful to people. We built this tool for AI developers or tinkerers who are using LLMs to work with documents, especially those building things like policy chatbots, legal assistants, or internal tools over PDFs. LLMs are powerful, but they’re also prone to hallucinating. This is especially true when summarizing or answering questions from dense documents like regulations, contracts, or technical reports. We see this all the time in our own AI projects, and we wanted a way to catch those errors before they reach users. This project started with our own frustrations. One of us is a professor and AI researcher at USF. The other has a PhD specializing in AI/NLP. We kept running into the same issue: LLMs giving confident, wrong answers in high-stakes domains. So we built a tool to make AI development more robust. Here’s how it works: - Upload your PDFs - Tell us what LLM you're using and the prompts you're testing - We analyze the documents and generate a spreadsheet of inputs likely to trigger mistakes It helps you test prompts, improve guardrails, and understand how your model might fail. You don't need to run live model calls or set up complex eval pipelines. This is primarily for: - Developers building AI tools that reason over documents - Teams deploying RAG systems or internal copilots - Researchers and QA folks focused on LLM evaluation and reliability - People just tinkering with chatbots that want to know how accurate they are We’re providing Product Hunt users a free preview of the hallucinations we find, and we only ask for one thing: We’d love feedback from early users. What’s helpful? What’s missing? How can we make this better? Thanks for checking it out. We’re here all day if you have questions or want to go deeper. - The Actualization.AI team

Report

1yr ago

FairPact AI

Maker

Hey there, awesome makers! 👋

We’re super excited to share our new tool that helps catch those tricky AI mistakes in your document-based projects. Give it a try and let us know what you think!

Report

1yr ago

FairPact AI

Maker

Really neat tool for anyone building with LLMs over documents. You upload PDFs, plug in your prompts, and it flags spots where your model is most likely to mess up—super helpful for testing and sanity-checking without needing to wire up eval pipelines. Definitely worth checking out if you’re working on RAG or document-based assistants.

Report

1yr ago

This tool is a game-changer for AI developers! By auto-analyzing PDFs and prompts to produce test inputs that trigger hallucinations, it helps validate outputs and test prompts effectively. I’m excited to see how it helps squash hallucinations early, ensuring more accurate and reliable AI performance from the start!

Report

1yr ago

It might be useful, good work👍

Report

1yr ago

Reviews