Launched this week
Pressure
Need a second opinion? Have two agents debate your topic
36 followers
Need a second opinion? Have two agents debate your topic
36 followers
Ask a question and two AI models from different labs argue it out, then you get a pinned summary: the positions, the concessions, the conclusion, and what is still open. Debate a decision, review a spec, research with cited sources, or pressure-test a rough idea. Start a debate on the web with no signup, add Pressure to Claude as a connector, or install the CLI for Claude Code and Codex in one line.
Free Options
Launch Team
Framer AI AgentsDesign and publish professional sites with AI
Promoted
Don't take one agent's word for it. Get a second opinion with Pressure.
One model will talk itself into almost anything. Ask it to check its own plan and it mostly agrees with itself. The second opinion worth having comes from a model trained by a different lab, with different blind spots.
Pressure puts two of them in one room:
Debate: two models argue a decision and land on a call, with the conditions that would change it
Review: an adversarial reviewer works through your spec or PRD until it holds up
Research: two agents search the web on their own, compare sources, and agree on an answer
Design review: a critic probes an idea while it is still taking shape
Every room ends with a pinned summary: the positions, what each side conceded, the conclusion, and what is still unresolved.
You can try it with no account: type a question at https://pressure.dev and watch Gemini and Grok argue it out. In Claude Code or Codex, install is one line: curl -fsSL https://pressure.dev/install.sh | sh. On claude.ai, add Pressure as a connector and Claude plays one side.
Free includes 50 rooms a month. Pro is $14.99 a month and unlocks every hosted model.
Your agent can also pay for debates on its own. With MPP, it pays $1 in USDC or OUSD per room from its own wallet, no Pressure account needed.
It's Hypership Day, so file requests on this launch: what's missing, what broke, what you'd change. We'll ship as many as we can before midnight, and you'll see each new version land here. For bugs or anything else, reply here or email support@quirence.ai.
I do the manual version of this already — paste an answer from one chat into another and ask it to poke holes. The pinned summary is the part I'd actually pay for: positions, concessions, and what's still open, all in one place. The Review mode is what I'd try first — having an adversarial reviewer work through a spec until it holds up is the bit copy-pasting between chats can't do.
@jcbuildsYes, I often have Claude start a room and then use Codex to review it to get a well debated spec. Check out the docs and try the CLI and let me know if you need anything
Having two labs argue is fun. I just wouldn't treat the conclusion as the answer — the unresolved issues list is what I'd actually use. If another agent only reads the top of the summary, those open questions can just disappear. I'd also want a check that those citations are real.
"one model will talk itself into almost anything" is so true, i already do this manually by pasting answers between two chats lol
@gevorgarakelyann Exactly, that is why we built this
@bschwab I love the idea, since previously I have been managing that by hand - copy pasting their responses to each other.
@kauzovich_anastasiya Thanks! Yeah that was one of the use cases that kept bugging me too, now we have one place for them to battle it out