Launching today
Aurick
Autonomous AI QA engineer. Test any app from a single URL
28 followers
Autonomous AI QA engineer. Test any app from a single URL
28 followers
Meet Aurick, your autonomous AI QA teammate. No test scripts, no manual recordings, and absolutely zero maintenance.Just give Aurick your application URL. Hundreds of AI agents will explore your product in real-time, test every single flow, and monitor your staging environment to catch bugs before production. Aurick reasons and adapts dynamically as your app changes, delivering comprehensive test coverage and rich debugging context automatically.
Payment Required
Launch Team / Built With
Hi Product Hunt! I’m Vithal, Founder of Aurick.
After 20+ years building and leading QA teams, I asked myself: What if AI could solve the same QA
problems autonomously?
That question became Aurick — an Autonomous AI QA Engineer.
A Once-in-a-Generation Shift: Automation → Autonomy
Developer productivity is increasing 10x with AI. You can’t simply hire 10x more QA engineers,
but Aurick can give every QA engineer 10x more capability with AI.
Our mission: move software testing from automation to autonomy.
What’s the difference?
Other AI testing tools → AI writes test scripts faster. But those scripts can still break with a single developer prompt or code change.
Aurick → No test scripts. No predefined steps. No recordings. No scripts to break or maintain.
Instead, Aurick works like a QA teammate — it explores, reasons, decides what to test, executes, adapts, and reports autonomously.
Product Hunt Launch Offer
50% off Explorer and 25% off Pro & Team plans.
Try Aurick on a real application, challenge it, and share your feedback.
🎥 Watch the 3-minute walkthrough
👉 Book a live demo
We’d love your feedback, questions, and support! ❤️
It is a good concept, especially the scriptless exploration part. I'm curious though, like how do you know the AI covered all the flows on your site?
@yash_akulwar Yeah, that’s an important part of it. Aurick first gets a sense of the different journeys and states it can reach across the live site, and uses that to guide the exploration.
So it’s not just “we ran 50 tests.” It looks at what it found versus what it actually exercised and surfaces anything it didn’t get to. You can also point it at specific journeys like onboarding or checkout when those are important.
The report then shows the flows, steps, failures, logs, and replay, so you can see what was actually covered.
If you get a chance to try it on your own site, I’d genuinely love to hear how the coverage looks from your side.
I've used enough Selenium/Playwright-based automation to know how annoying test maintenance gets. The idea of moving some of that maintenance burden to an agent is pretty compelling.
@aakriti_jasrotia Yes! Test maintenance is actually one of the pain points we really wanted to tackle with Aurick. Instead of constantly updating selectors and scripts as the product changes, Aurick can adapt to the flow on its own looking at ur UI changes, like a real user. Would love to hear what you think after trying it out!
I've always found regression testing particularly painful after UI changes. If Aurick can actually adapt to those changes without someone rewriting tests, that's a pretty meaningful difference.
@akhil_jasrotia Yeah, exactly. That’s usually where regression testing starts getting painful. With Aurick, the idea is that you shouldn’t have to rewrite tests every time the UI moves around. It adapts to the changes, and runs the flow again as manual tester would.
And you still get the pass/fail report with logs, screenshots, step-by-step replay, plus issues like broken flows.
Would genuinely love to hear how it holds up on a build with some real UI changes without you having to touch the tests.
Does it get better at understanding the same app over repeated runs, or start fresh each time?