Hey Product Hunt
The rubric was public. Nobody read it.
Every competition ā hackathon, case comp, datathon, pitch event ā publishes a brief that says exactly how you'll be judged. Evaluation criteria, deliverables, what the organiser actually cares about. Most teams read the deadline and the prize, then start building.
We built Wynit after watching good teams lose to teams that had simply read more carefully.
Paste any competition link and Wynit reads the brief and gives you:
ā what the judges are actually scoring, in plain English
ā where your team stands against each criterion
ā a prep plan tied to your team's real state, not advice that would fit any competition
We started with Smart India Hackathon: all 229 problem statements for 2026, decoded. It's live and public ā no account needed: wynit.tech/sih/browse
What it won't do: write your submission, or promise you'll win. It reads the brief, tells you what it asks for, and keeps your team honest about the gap.
Two things I'd genuinely like feedback on:
1. Is the decode useful on a competition you know well? Paste one and tell me where it's wrong ā that's the fastest way we improve it.
2. What did you lose a competition to that you only understood afterwards?