I built SUDHI because one confident answer is often the wrong shape for a hard decision. Two lessons I took from Napoleon Hill's Think and Grow Rich became its foundation. First, a serious room should not treat easy agreement as proof; it should surface the strongest dissent and work through it. Second, intelligence is not knowing everything yourself. It is knowing where to find dependable knowledge when you need it and turning that knowledge into action. Those are my personal takeaways, not quotations. They led to a Board of 10 with fixed roles across strategy, execution, customer value, risk, economics, contrarian testing, systems, product quality, long-term integrity, and personal capacity. The Board keeps disagreement visible, separates facts from assumptions, researches when current evidence is needed, and states what would change its recommendation. The useful result is concrete: one recommendation, the case against it, conditional odds across likely paths, and a next move. Afterward, the Decision Loop records what you chose, what happened, and whether the Board was well calibrated. The web version is ready to try now at sudhi.app. iPhone and iPad are coming. I would value blunt feedback: what consequential decision would you bring to this room first, and what evidence would make the final report useful enough to act on?

SUDHI

Personal Board of 10 for decisions that deserve debate

Personal Board of 10 for decisions that deserve debate