Compare a CV with a real job description requirement by requirement. See the supporting source lines, identify genuine gaps, and get reframes that keep employers, dates and metrics locked.

I built CV Aligner after seeing a recurring failure in AI-assisted CV writing: a polished reframe can quietly become an invented claim. The product compares a CV with a real job description requirement by requirement, shows the source lines behind each assessment, and locks employers, dates and metrics. A genuine experience gap remains a gap. The free evidence report needs no account or payment. I do not yet have first-party evidence of improved interview outcomes, so feedback on the evidence trail and failure cases is especially useful.

I built CV Aligner around a narrow constraint: every suggested CV change should remain traceable to evidence the applicant supplied. It compares a CV with a real job description requirement by requirement, shows the supporting lines, and keeps employers, dates and metrics locked. If the evidence is missing, the product should expose the gap rather than write around it.

The free evidence report requires no account or payment. I do not yet have first-party evidence of improved interview outcomes, so I am looking for difficult test cases rather than endorsements. Which failure case would you test first: ambiguous transferable experience, conflicting dates, overly generic job descriptions, or something else?

CV Aligner

Source-traced CV tailoring without invented claims

Source-traced CV tailoring without invented claims

Forum Threads

What failure case should an evidence-traced CV tool handle first?

Forum Threads

What failure case should an evidence-traced CV tool handle first?