GlobalMatch replaces CV keyword screening with one structured AI interview. Candidates get evidence-linked profiles and role matches; hiring teams see scores tied to exact quotes and timestamps. No auto-rejection: AI ranks, humans decide. Free for candidates.
What could you build with GPT-5.6 that wasn’t practical before?
Maker
With GPT-5.6, we can build a persistent, evidence-linked career agent that understands the whole person ,not just a CV. It can reason across a candidate’s resume, interview answers, target roles, preferences, and feedback; ask adaptive follow-up questions; identify demonstrated skills; and explain every assessment with the exact quote and timestamp behind it.
What was not practical before was running this as one coherent workflow at marketplace scale. The same agent can compare a candidate with many jobs, explain why each match is strong or weak, suggest realistic career and reskilling paths, and help companies search for people based on demonstrated evidence rather than polished keywords.
This allows GlobalMatch to replace static CV screening with an ongoing conversation: candidates are understood more deeply, companies find better-fit talent faster, and humans remain in control of every hiring decision.
Report
Maker
📌
Hi Product Hunt 👋
We are Aref and Dani, co-founders of GlobalMatch.
We built GlobalMatch because too many hiring decisions still begin with CV keywords.
That creates two problems:
Strong candidates are often overlooked because their real experience, communication, and problem-solving ability are not visible in a resume. and also they can't apply to all jobs on the market because it takes too much time.
Hiring teams spend hours screening applications without enough evidence to understand who is actually worth interviewing and who used chatgpt to write the CV and have right keywords.
GlobalMatch replaces early CV guessing with one structured AI interview.
Candidates upload their resume, complete a structured interview, and receive an evidence-linked profile with role matches and development recommendations.
Hiring teams can review structured scores, summaries, and the exact quotes and timestamps behind them.
A key principle for us is simple:
AI can structure and rank the evidence, but a human makes the hiring decision. GlobalMatch does not automatically reject candidates.
For this launch, we are especially looking for:
• Candidates who want to build a profile based on what they can actually do
• Recruiters and hiring managers willing to test the hiring-side experience
• Honest feedback on trust, transparency, and the usefulness of our matching results
I would especially love your thoughts on one question:
What evidence would you need to trust an AI-generated candidate profile before inviting someone to an interview?
Thank you for checking out GlobalMatch
Report
Maker
Dani here, CTO, I built the pipeline Aref is describing, so let me add the part under the hood.
On his question about trust: our answer was to make every score traceable. No skill gets a number without a quote and a timestamp attached. Each competency is evaluated separately rather than asking one model for an overall impression, because "7/10 communication" means nothing if you can't see the three moments that produced it.
The other constraint was EU-first. Everything runs on EU infrastructure, GDPR-native, and we designed against the EU AI Act's high-risk requirements from day one rather than retrofitting later. Human decides, always.
Ask me anything technical, I'll be in the comments all day.
Report
Already tried it out! GREAT PRODUCT. Worked for me better than the other competitors
Dani here, CTO, I built the pipeline Aref is describing, so let me add the part under the hood.
On his question about trust: our answer was to make every score traceable. No skill gets a number without a quote and a timestamp attached. Each competency is evaluated separately rather than asking one model for an overall impression, because "7/10 communication" means nothing if you can't see the three moments that produced it.
The other constraint was EU-first. Everything runs on EU infrastructure, GDPR-native, and we designed against the EU AI Act's high-risk requirements from day one rather than retrofitting later. Human decides, always.
Ask me anything technical, I'll be in the comments all day.
Already tried it out! GREAT PRODUCT. Worked for me better than the other competitors