Launched this week
AICrossCheck
Ask multiple AIs, get one defensible answer
15 followers
Ask multiple AIs, get one defensible answer
15 followers
AICrossCheck asks ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Grok to answer independently, challenge each other’s claims and evidence, and produce one clear decision brief. Instead of comparing five separate responses yourself, you get a final judgment with key evidence, disagreements, confidence, and recommended next steps.
Would love to see a way to pin or save the source models you want in the panel, like just ChatGPT and Claude for some checks, or adding newer ones like DeepSeek. Right now it feels like a fixed lineup and sometimes I only need two or three.
@duduelci Great suggestion — custom model selection / pinning is something we’ll optimize based on feedback like yours. Thanks for sharing this!
Would be awesome if you could let me pick which models go head to head instead of always running all five, since some queries don't need Grok or Perplexity and it would save time and API costs
@pekwksj Great point — custom model selection (pick 2–3 instead of always running all five) is something we’re actively planning. It should help with both speed and API costs. Thanks for the feedback!
The way you surface disagreements and confidence levels alongside the final brief makes the whole process feel less like a black box and more like actually reading a well-edited report. That clarity is rare.
@erdem532247 Thanks, Erdem! Making the reasoning, disagreements, and confidence levels visible was a big priority for us. We want the final brief to feel trustworthy, not like another opaque AI answer.
Love that the models actually push back on each other instead of just echoing the prompt back at you. Clean way to surface real disagreements instead of a polite consensus blob.
@fikriyencow Thanks, Fikriye! That’s exactly what we wanted to avoid—the usual “average answer” that hides meaningful disagreement. Really glad the pushback between models came through clearly.
love how it goes past simple consensus and actually scores the disagreements with evidence. the confidence breakdown is a nice touch for keeping the output honest.
@leventerdapyuc Thanks a lot, Levent — that’s the best kind of encouragement for us. If you have a chance, try running one of your real decisions through AICrossCheck and tell us how the brief feels in practice. 🙌
the way it gets the models to actually challenge each other's claims instead of just blending their answers is honestly the smartest take on ai comparison i've seen.
@sebahattincorl Thanks, Sebahattin! We believe the disagreements are often more valuable than the consensus. Getting the models to challenge each other is what helps AICrossCheck produce a stronger final answer.