Zypressen

Mostly just talking through ideas with Claude/ChatGPT in the browser, then jumping into Cursor to prototype.

The magic isn’t in the output — it’s in killing bad ideas before they waste real time.

“McKinsey-level insights” is a bold claim — love the ambition! For non-technical users, the real test is: can it explain why a trend matters, not just surface it?

Love the “edit by text” promise — that’s the dream for non-editors.

"AI chaos" + "surprisingly behaves" = the indie dev paradox I live for 😂

I’ve tried both 5.1 — honestly, the code quality hasn’t impressed me.

Anyone else noticing improvements in text rendering?

“Our kids will think about keyboards the way I think about punch cards.” This line hit me hard. We’re not just building voice interfaces — we’re retiring the idea that computers need to be “typed at.”

I stick with IDE-based AI — it keeps me in the flow.

Interesting approach! But how do you ensure comments feel organic and not spammy?

This is the right framing: “help navigate, not replace.” The moment health AI claims authority, it becomes dangerous.

I've only used ChatGPT Images for generating visuals, mainly for work-related tasks like UI mockups. It handles text and layout well enough for my needs.

Thanks so much for sharing your experience — this is incredibly helpful (and relatable!). Really appreciate the honesty and all the hard-won lessons.

Yep, 4.5’s my daily driver for coding + agents.

I start from scratch less, but think from scratch more.

Sustainable output > performative exhaustion. Great teams ship on energy, not hours.

My first vibe-coded thing was a dead-simple Q&A bot using the Claude API—just a local script that answers questions from my notes.

I lean toward Sonnet 4.5 for correctness—it rarely messes up. Same time, Gemini sometimes surprises me with really smart suggestions.