Zoe Sullivan's profile on Product Hunt

About

I work with startups and remote-first teams to help them find people who genuinely enjoy building things online. Recruiting made me realize how much personality, curiosity, and communication matter beyond just resumes or job titles. I enjoy meeting ambitious people, understanding team culture, and helping companies grow with the right mix of talent and energy. Most of my work involves conversations, relationship building, and figuring out whether someone will actually enjoy the environment they’re joining. I’m especially interested in internet startups, remote work culture, and people doing creative or unconventional work online.

Links

Twitter

Badges

Tastemaker

Tastemaker 5

Gone streaking

Gone streaking 5

Forums

p/premast-templates

•

20d ago

What's the step you wish could disappear forever?

Building a presentation in 2026 shouldn't look like this:

Search for inspiration
Write content
Design slides
Fix formatting
Fix formatting again
Fix formatting one more time

We're working on changing that. launching in few days stay tuned!

What's the step you wish could disappear forever?

p/lineage-lens

•

1mo ago

What would make an AI provenance report trustworthy?

I think most AI governance conversations stop too early.

Teams talk about dashboards, usage charts, and prompt capture. Those are useful, but they are not the same thing as a trustworthy record.

The harder problem is this: if someone asks you six months later whether a block of code was AI-generated, can you prove the record still means what it said when it was created?

That is why we added two things in LineageLens: a provenance hash chain and a signed AI BOM export.

p/lineage-lens

•

2mo ago

When the same AI edit means different things in different places

One thing that surfaced while tightening LineageLens this week: capture is not the hard part. Agreement is.

If the extension, backend, and MCP server describe the same AI edit with slightly different field names or status values, you do not have provenance, you have three believable stories about the same event. That matters because reviewers and assistants start trusting whichever surface they looked at last.

The question I keep coming back to is simple: if a record can look applied in one place and accepted in another, is that still a single source of truth?