Hey PH WaxFrame launches this Tuesday (Aug 4) and I wanted to open this up before then.
The idea started from a simple annoyance: every AI writing tool picks one model and treats its opinion as the answer. But different models actually disagree with each other in useful ways one catches structural issues, another catches tone, another catches factual gaps.
WaxFrame runs your document through a "hive" of Worker Bee AIs ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, and Perplexity by default, plus Cohere, DeepSeek, Jamba, and Together AI as custom add-ins that critique it in rounds, then a separate Builder AI synthesizes their feedback into revisions. When the hive disagrees, you get pulled in as the tiebreaker instead of one model silently overriding another.
It's a vanilla HTML/CSS/JS app no backend, no server round-trips with your document, runs entirely in your browser with your own API keys. Free edition + a Pro version.
WaxFrame runs a "hive" of AI models (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Perplexity) that critique your document across iterative rounds until they converge, synthesized by a separate Builder AI. When reviewers disagree, you decide the tiebreaker in the Conflicts panel. No backend, no account — runs entirely in your browser with your own API keys, so there's no subscription markup. AGPL-3.0 open source, portable — no install, runs from file://. Free trial, $19 lifetime
