used
A great idea with a great design and good implementation. I find the references to official and good sources very nice. I was just wondering whether all the tests should really be completed within the specified time periods. This is not recommended in Germany.
What's great
well-designed app (3)references to official sources (1)
Report
What I think is good:
1. Design/UI
2. Idea behind the project
What I don't like:
1. You should disclose the source of your datasets. Just a reminder, the ISIC datasets are not intended for commercial use.
2. You should be careful when specifying your sensitivity information, as people may rely on it and, in the worst case scenario, die. According to your accuracy report, the whole thing was not tested under real conditions, i.e. NEW photos taken with the smartphone. From our own experience, these results differ greatly from those from cleaned datasets.
3. You indicate on your website under the heading ''Stay healthy & be safe ❤️'' that your product is GDPR compliant. Many people will mistake this for a medical clinical validation of your project, which it is not. This is misleading. Human lives are at stake here, such tricks should not be used.
What's great
user-friendly interface (5)
What needs improvement
misleading medical validation claims (1)accuracy concerns with real-world conditions (1)dataset source disclosure issues (1)
Report
20 views