Tamar Waziri

My approach in 2025 is validation first. I use no-code tools to launch fast, AI to fill gaps and manual work where needed. Once demand is real, I worry about scaling. Until then, speed beats clean architecture every time.

I hate that memory doesn't travel. I buld context in one product and lose everything switching tools. As a user, I don't care about platforms, I care about continuity. My brain is interoperable; Ai memory still isn't.

I used to chase numbers, 12 launches, 24 launches, whatever. Now I treat each project like a hypothesis. If I can validate or kill it quickly, that's success. Some take two days, some take two months. The pace adapts to the idea, not the calendar.

I love that it isn't just another generic AI tool but something designed to real biomedical complexity. As someone who constantly cross-checks experiments and literature, I feel like this could give me clarity faster. It's the kind of assistant I've wished for in the lab.

Really enjoyed reading this! I've always struggled with picking the right launch day. Your weekend strategy makes a lot of sense for indie dev products. I've been refining my tagline too, so your example gave me a benchmark. thanks for sharing such practical takeaways!