Stefano Monteduro

Stefano Monteduro

45 points

About

Passionate programmer, movies and entertainment lover. Always looking for new ideas and projects. Lecce supporter—because yellow and red is a way of life! 🚀🎬💛❤️

Badges

Pixel perfection 💎
Pixel perfection 💎
Bright Idea 💡
Bright Idea 💡
Tastemaker
Tastemaker
Tastemaker 5
Tastemaker 5
View all badges

Forums

I pivoted Orango to MCP-USE and launching soon 🚀

I was building Orango to allow AI agents to use any software product.

Then, MCP came out.
Model Context Protocol is the new standard for connecting LLMs to external tools, data sources, and environments.

So we started building mcp-use, the open-source library to interact with MCP servers with custom agents.

Are developers losing the race to no-code/vibe-coding?

I'm a developer. And as a developer, I probably have a huge disadvantage: I see every product with an overly critical, perfectionist mindset. Meanwhile, no-code and AI tools are making it easier than ever to build software without technical skills. But here's the paradox: this shift favors non-technical makers over developers. Why? Because they don t care (or even think) about: that slow query that might crash under load; that pixel-perfect UI; that memory-hungry process; tha non-DRY code; that perfect payment integration; Etc... I know what you're thinking: "Dude, just build an MVP and launch fast." But that's not my point. Even if I try to move fast, as a developer, it's hard to unsee the flaws. So here's my real question: Are we in an era where people with fewer technical skills are actually at an advantage? To me, it definitely feels like an advantage for non-technical makers.
Gabe Perez

10mo ago

Does it matter if your app was purely "vibe coded" for acquisitions?

I've been having a lot of fun exploring AI and using tools like @Cursor, @bolt.new, @Lovable, and @Warp to learn how to build and make some apps for myself! I'm also noticing a tremendous amount of growth in folks creating their own apps using these same tools which has me wondering... if a company wanted to acquire someone's app or tool that was built via vibe coding, would it matter how it was built? Does the method of how it was built impact the valuation?
In my idealistic eyes, I'd like to think it doesn't. As an acquisition is often much more than just the tech but also the user base, brand, and even team behind the product. If anything I think that acquiring a product that has been "vibe coded" and putting them into capable engineering hands would only enhance the product...or a least make the code base cleaner.
I also believe that talent that is able to create stunning products with AI is currently a small percentage of folks, and that companies should be investing in acquiring that talent (either independently or via product acquisition) so that they can stay ahead in innovation while learning how to implement AI tools more efficiently in their orgs.
Very curious to hear what you all think!

View more