All activity
Pranab Sarkarleft a comment
I built this after getting burned twice. I asked Claude to review an architecture decision. It said it looked solid. Asked GPT. Also solid. I shipped it. It wasn't solid. The models weren't lying - they were pattern-matching toward agreement. A single model has almost no incentive to contradict you. brainstorm-mcp forces disagreement by design. Three models answer independently, then respond to...
BrainstormMake your AI models argue. Ship better ideas.
Your AI is a yes-man. It agrees with itself, sounds confident, and steers you wrong. brainstorm-mcp makes Claude, GPT, and Gemini debate each other in your editor - so the cracks show before you ship.
BrainstormMake your AI models argue. Ship better ideas.