Yesterday was a busy day at CodeReviewr 😅
Yesterday was a busy day at CodeReviewr 😅 🧠 Claude Opus 4.5 is live! We shipped Claude Opus 4.5 integration (and holy hell, the code analysis depth is next-level). While we were at it, we built a model-swap system—adding new frontier models is now a one-button deploy. No more waiting to test the latest from Anthropic, OpenAI, or anyone else. 🔒 Real-time package vulnerability scanning Thanks to...
Building in public feels uncomfortable. Sharing half-baked features? Even worse. But here we go.
We're adding Insights to CodeReviewr — a static analyzer that maps your codebase health before AI reviews even start. https://vimeo.com/1136120639?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=ci What you'll see: Cyclomatic complexity and file metrics Dependency graphs (fan-in/fan-out, circular deps) Unused exports and isolated files Issue hotspots by severity and risk score That's useful on its own. But here's where it...
CodeReviewr – Pay per review, not per seat
Hi all! 👋 I'm the founder (and only team member) of CodeReviewr. I was paying $30/month for a code review tool I used twice a week. That's $7.50 per review. So I built CodeReviewr: AI code review with pay-per-token pricing instead of subscriptions. The problem: Every major AI code review tool charges $12-30/month per seat. For solo developers and small teams doing 5-20 reviews per month, you're...
CodeReviewr – AI code review that charges per token, not per developer
Last month I added up my developer subscriptions: $240/month. $2,880/year. The worst part? I was paying $30/month for a code review tool I used twice a week. That's $7.50 per review for something that should cost under $1. So I built CodeReviewr: AI-powered code review with pay-per-token pricing. No subscriptions. No seat licenses. Just pay for what you actually use. Why this matters: Solo...