I ve been building PageLens AI after seeing the same thing over and over again with AI-built websites and apps. The product looks done . But then you look properly and find the stuff that gets missed when people are shipping fast: Missing security headers Weak mobile CTAs Poor accessibility basics Broken social previews SEO basics not set up
Analytics/consent problems Confusing copy No clear trust signals Logged-in routes that nobody has properly reviewed I don t think this is because builders are careless. I think tools like Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, Replit and v0 have made it incredibly easy to build quickly, but most founders still need a proper launch-readiness pass before sending real users, investors or paid traffic to the site. So I m building PageLens AI as launch QA for AI-built websites and apps. The idea is: 1. Scan your site 2. Get a ranked report of what s hurting trust, SEO, accessibility, security, mobile UX and conversion 3. Export the fixes as Markdown for Cursor / Claude / Lovable / Bolt 4. Fix the issues 5. Re-scan and prove it improved I d love feedback from other makers here: Do you run any kind of launch QA checklist before sharing a new product publicly? Or are most people just shipping and fixing issues after users notice them? For context, this is what I m building: https://www.pagelensai.com Not looking for upvotes here, genuinely interested in whether other makers see this same gap.
PageLens AI scans your AI-built website or app for SEO, accessibility, security, mobile, trust and launch-readiness issues — then gives you Markdown fixes you can paste into Cursor, Claude, Lovable or Bolt.
