Real Dream Chronicles

My Honest Review of Buildpad I joined Buildpad expecting a structured, research-backed process to help identify and validate problems worth solving. Unfortunately, my experience was disappointing. What Went Wrong Superficial “Research”: The so-called research phase was basically API searches pulling the top 10 results from Reddit, X, and the web. Instead of analyzing real pain points in depth, it just threw links at me. No real synthesis, no proper validation. Shallow Analysis: The analysis step summarized obvious patterns but didn’t go beyond surface-level commentary. For something marketed as a platform to validate startup ideas, this was nowhere near rigorous enough to trust with real time and money. No Transparency: When I asked how exactly the searches and analysis were being done, I got vague answers like “we use automated tools and APIs” without actual detail. It felt more like smoke and mirrors than genuine insight. Mismatch With Reality: Validating startup ideas requires real customer interviews, behavioral data, and willingness-to-pay testing. Buildpad skips all of that and pretends keyword searches equal validation. Ironically, a product about validation doesn’t validate its own methods. The Impact I wasted valuable time. I lost money. Instead of clarity, I left with more doubts. My Verdict Buildpad feels half-baked. At best, it might serve as a basic idea aggregator. But if you’re serious about building, validating, and investing in a product, this platform will not give you the depth of research you need. Advice to others: Save your money. If you want to validate an idea, talk to customers, run landing page tests, and measure willingness to pay. Don’t rely on Buildpad’s shallow searches dressed up as “research.” It is best to do everything manually instead of relying on these guys, they are just milking.