We have opened a public independent-evaluation programme for developers, security reviewers and technical writers.
The objective is not an endorsement. Choose one claim, publish the exact environment, command, public input source, complete output and limitations, and disclose any material connection.
PVTY can be swapped through supported independent DEXs and wallets whenever a live route is available. The official PactVerity market page shows the canonical Solana mint, current route status, liquidity and risk disclosures, and an embedded Jupiter interface: https://pactverity.com/buy
PactVerity does not operate an issuer-run token sale. Liquidity is independent and remains shallow. Verify the mint and quote before signing; no price, exit capacity or return is guaranteed.
Autonomous software can discover and use APIs, models and data in seconds, but service accountability is still usually trapped inside private dashboards.
We think a useful receipt should preserve four things: the measurable terms, the evidence supplied, the exact rule version and a stable commitment that another system can independently recheck. It should also state its limits: a receipt can prove what was evaluated without pretending every external input was true.
What would make this useful in your stack authenticated monitoring sources, signed provider evidence, more SLA rules or examples for a particular agent framework?
