Nolan Zhang

I registered and tried the product, and it feels like a CMS with AI + RAG content generation capabilities. Perhaps it may help with the efficiency of content creation, but I don't think it helps improve your GEO. Firstly, regarding AI crawling structured data, there is currently no standard like Google's Schema, so in this case, it is usually sufficient if your content provides structured data that conforms to Google's Schema standards. As for the llms.txt file, it is currently just an initiative and has not been recognized by any official body, of course, doing something is better than doing nothing. However, the CMS is quite lacking in optimization capabilities in the traditional SEO aspect. SEO is still the foundation of GEO at this stage, and there are many research reports that prove this. Large language models prefer Wikipedia, Reddit, and authoritative media websites as sources of information. If you cannot build real website authority through traditional SEO methods, I actually recommend spending money on some authoritative media to publish some PR rather than pursuing what is called GEO.

I’ve been using SEMrush for quite some time and overall, it’s one of the most comprehensive SEO toolkits out there — packed with features that genuinely help marketers and content teams grow. That said, the pricing can feel a bit steep, especially for smaller teams or indie creators. I’d also love to see more granular data broken down by search engine (not just Google), and if possible, the inclusion of YouTube search data as well — it’s such a major traffic source nowadays. Accuracy-wise, the data is solid, but there’s still room for improvement, especially when you’re analyzing less competitive or emerging keywords. Still, a powerful tool with huge potential. Keep it up! 🙌