Nabeel-mohi-ud-din

I was using Cursor recently to refactor a component for a client project. The initial bug fix worked instantly, so I skimmed through the diff, trusted the output, and pushed it straight into testing.

Everything looked fine on the surface until I realized the AI had silently refactored an underlying state logic that broke a completely unrelated edge case. It took me twice as long to trace and undo that hidden change than it would have to write the fix manually from scratch.

I m definitely not against vibe coding or AI tools they speed up the workflow tremendously. But this experience taught me a valuable lesson: never accept a diff without carefully reviewing how it impacts state and global variables.

Now, whenever I prompt an AI assistant for a quick fix, I explicitly ask it to only touch the targeted lines and explain any unintended side effects before applying changes.

How do you handle code reviews when vibe coding? Do you inspect every line of the diff, or do you rely on automated tests to catch quiet regressions? Would love to hear your approach!

Hey Product Hunt community!

I m Nabeel, Founder and Marketing Specialist focused on product promotion, business marketing, and driving measurable results. With a background rooted in English Language and Literature from GC University Faisalabad, I love blending communication strategy with marketing.

I've been working as a Marketing Manager and Product Marketing Specialist, helping businesses achieve sustainable growth through targeted initiatives.

I joined Product Hunt to discover innovative tools, learn from other founders, and connect with fellow creators.