used
Having used Albato for a few months now, I’ve been thoroughly impressed by its capabilities and efficiency. Compared to other solutions in the area, the Albato platform is one of the most intuitive and user-friendly ones that I've used, making it easy even for a novice like me to automate various tasks.
One of the standout features for me has been the range of integrations Albato offers. It significantly streamlined my workflow, allowing me to connect different apps and automate repetitive tasks. The custom app integrator is particularly useful, and while it may have a learning curve, it’s definitely worth the effort.
My only complaint, an area where Albato could improve, is the way operations are counted. The current method seems to consume a high volume extremely fast, which could be a concern for heavy users.
Overall, it’s an affordable alternative to more established platforms like Zapier and it does a good job filling up the gaps that Pabbly Connect doesn't fill. I’m excited to see how this platform evolves and would definitely recommend trying it to anyone looking to automate their business processes.
What's great
user-friendly interface (68)affordable pricing (32)Zapier alternative (42)extensive app integration (61)custom app integrator (27)
What needs improvement
operation counting issues (5)
Report
4 views
This was a super disappointment, from it's poor UX to it's almost pointless generations. Honestly, this feels like it the poor code was put together with bubble gum and toothpicks. Stable Diffusion is pretty easy to implement on almost any Linux system, so it's surprising that this was botched up so much.
I would look elsewhere, the value prop isn't here and this has a long way to go with too many competent competitors doing a much better job. AI generations is becoming more of a commodity that if you wait just a little longer you'll see it implemented in existing software and a much more reasonable cost.
Report
used
First of all, this other guy 'Alex Lp' who is acting like a toddler who's parents won't give him a cookie by leaving a low review because he can't handle the fact the there isn't a Mac OS app. That's not a review, that's a whiny complaint that doesn't take in consideration the efforts of the development team and their roadmap that will include compatibility with more operating systems. It's not really hard concept to understand, but clearly it is for some.
This product does what it claims and does it with style. As someone who has an iPhone and a Windows PC without a camera this clearly is the best solution for a webcam. Crystal clear video that virtually no budget friendly standalone webcam can provide couples with great frame rate and some wonderful extra features.
There are a few features that I wish this had, maybe a way to allow multiple iPhones to plug into the single virtual camera (or virtual cameras) to help with unique situations like workout training or wedding livestreams. I also wish this had the ability for custom borders to help make certain cameras stand out, even if it's a simple colored vignette.
Lastly, I would like to mention that with the next version of Mac having this feature built in that I'm glad the dev team here actually chose to make the savvy decision to build out Windows compatibility first. Spending resources where they make the most sense. Also, Alex, if you are reading this then have you even thought about how Macbooks come with webcams where not all Windows desktop PCs don't necessarily? Be respectful and be mindful.
Report
1 view
