I've heard and read both "users ignore it completely" and "it's the most useful signal we have". Seems like the difference is mostly about when and how you ask.
Just launched PulseAhead on PH today - lifecycle surveys for SaaS teams. Would love to hear real experiences from people who've been through this.
PulseAhead is a purpose-built lifecycle survey pack for SaaS teams. Quick to setup, it captures user profiles, first-touch attribution, helps understand onboarding friction, measures activation confidence and product-market fit, tracks loyalty with Net Promoter Score (NPS), and captures reasons for churn at the moment users cancel, with everything flowing into one real-time dashboard.
I m exploring how websites that rely on AI-generated content manage updates when underlying information changes or new information needs to be added. For example: if an AI writes an article about "Best Practices for SEO in 2023," how do you efficiently update it to "2024" incorporating new additions in a coherent way without regenerating the entire piece?
Regenerating the whole article would be inefficient as it could erase formatting, disrupt internal links. Also it probably wouldn't send the right signal to search engines where whole article changes for every update.
