Hari Gokul

We ve all seen it.

A test fails, the pipeline turns red, and the first thing we do is open the report and start digging through the error.

But the frustrating part is that a failed test doesn t always mean there s a bug in the application.

Maybe a selector changed.

I ve been exploring AI-powered testing recently, and one thing I find interesting is how testing is moving beyond just writing and running automated scripts.

With tools like X360AITECH, AI can help with things like test generation, natural-language automation, self-healing, and failure analysis.

But I m curious about how others see this.

Do you think AI will mainly help reduce repetitive testing work, or can it actually change the way QA teams approach test coverage and debugging?